Barack Obama

[Talvenada]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

I'm not talking about a $trillion. I'm talking about just $2 billion more. Something that fits well within our resources if it weren't for literally $trillions being wasted on crap. And I'm talking about a program that will have massive payoffs if it's done right.

TRACY:

Conse 'Pubs are linguists, no? Here are some examples I've heard!

That is $300,000 that he's going to waste on that! Do you know how much money that is?

That program will cost $200B for 3 or 4 years! That's almost a trillion dollars!!
$600B to $800B is almost what? In other words, 60% to 80% is almost 100%.

It's not trillions; it's ONLY $2B!

TAL

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by Talvenada

TRACY:

Conse 'Pubs are linguists, no? Here are some examples I've heard!

That is $300,000 that he's going to waste on that! Do you know how much money that is?

That program will cost $200B for 3 or 4 years! That's almost a trillion dollars!!
$600B to $800B is almost what? In other words, 60% to 80% is almost 100%.

It's not trillions; it's ONLY $2B!

TAL

No, republicans are talking about how the programs funded in this budget will leave us with a debt of over $20 trillion in ten years. You can call that linguistics, but it still means we're fucked.

I'm talking about an extra $2 billion. You know, like last year when the cash for clunkers program needed an extra $2 billion. Congress instantly says, sure no problem. Here you go. But maintain the US's lead in space? Invest in future technologies that will provide literally worlds of resources, no that's too expensive.