Quote:
Originally Posted by SluttyShemaleAnna
Hmmm, well at double the ram, and with 2x2ghz vs your 3.4, and a DX10 graphics card, your only advantage will be in FSB, as the laptop version of hte core 2 only as an 800mhz FSB, however I just googled it and your FSB is no faster, so I think I got you whooped. My old tower had a radeon 9600XT before it died and even with it overclocked to the limit, the Nvidia 8400 beats it, so your 9550 is going to get whooped. The only thing mine lack is HDD space, because I just coundn't afford a drive upgrade, I am planning on getting a media server tho, so that should solve my problem as mostly my drive is full of videos.
Admit it boyo, your tower just got beaten by a 13" laptop! lol.
|
my dear lady, it is easy to mention litlle numbers and proclaim victory. my 9550 is a beast in sheeps clothing. with 256mb and 128 bit, it whollaped a grafix card with triple the power and six times the price tag. my buddy was weeping.

i have managed to kill, yes kill a fancy smancy core 2 dup jobbie with similar spces to yours. needless to say i was disappointed...yet my rig leeps going, it does sound like a turbine though. i aint gonna lie, 3d mark and other hardware testing programs dont produce favourable results. but hey, those are just numbers. i can add more ram but what would be the point? im happy with my rig. i'd rather spend the cash towards a sweet ford escort mkll