pics of you?

[sesame]

I just added bird on Ila's request.
Its not my artwork though.
Its my Photoshopping!

[ila]

Originally Posted by sesame

I just added bird on Ila's request.
Its not my artwork though.
Its my Photoshopping!

It looks good Sesame.

[sesame]

Thank you my friend, for your kind words.

[prof_unrat]

Just an update: Obama now is the presidential candidate of the Democrats. Unfortunately his acceptance speech was dreadful. Instead of outlining what he was standing for Obama tried desperately to be "everything to everyone", thus turning himself into a character of no principles. Indeed the speech was clearly inferior to G.W.Bush's speech in 2000 (it was not exactly a great speech, but it got the message over). I consider this a pity, as I initially had great sympathy for Barack Obama, but now I realised that Obama is not the revolutioner he was slated to be. His desperate attempts to win over loyal Hlary Clinton supporters will alienate him from the more moderate voters - and those in the "Bible Belt" who are maligned for causing the "burden of the Bush administration". John McCain may well turn out to become more acceptable. After all there is no direct vote in a U.S. presidential election...
Besides, the horrific 9/11 attack was not directed against G.W.Bush's administration but against that of Bill Clinton! It was Clinton who bungled attacks on Al Quaeda leaders towards the end of his presidency, triggering the deadly chain of events. Poor planning by Al Quaeda caused delays for the "revenge" attacks, so that Bush's government was hit instead. The rest is history.

[Ogryn1313]

Originally Posted by prof_unrat

Just an update: Obama now is the presidential candidate of the Democrats. Unfortunately his acceptance speech was dreadful. Instead of outlining what he was standing for Obama tried desperately to be "everything to everyone", thus turning himself into a character of no principles. Indeed the speech was clearly inferior to G.W.Bush's speech in 2000 (it was not exactly a great speech, but it got the message over). I consider this a pity, as I initially had great sympathy for Barack Obama, but now I realised that Obama is not the revolutioner he was slated to be. His desperate attempts to win over loyal Hlary Clinton supporters will alienate him from the more moderate voters - and those in the "Bible Belt" who are maligned for causing the "burden of the Bush administration". John McCain may well turn out to become more acceptable. After all there is no direct vote in a U.S. presidential election...
Besides, the horrific 9/11 attack was not directed against G.W.Bush's administration but against that of Bill Clinton! It was Clinton who bungled attacks on Al Quaeda leaders towards the end of his presidency, triggering the deadly chain of events. Poor planning by Al Quaeda caused delays for the "revenge" attacks, so that Bush's government was hit instead. The rest is history.

It is convenient to blame Bush for it all since 9/11 happened during his administration. And all the conspiracy nuts and left wingers conveniently actual and factual history.

Al Qaeda attacked American interests numerous times while the Great Clinton led the sheep America to prosperity. His economy was so wonderful. Never mind that one of the main engines which drove it, the so called "Internet Bubble" had nothing to do with him. And it did collapse in his administration and when he left he left the nation in recession.

But as far as Al Qaeda goes...

let's see...well there was the apartment building which they blew up killing 100 or Americans. As well as numerous attacks against our allies.

Oh yeah, and a previous attack on none other than the World Trade Center itself. How easily that was forgotten.

And we cannot forget the Cole. 17 sailors killed. Right at the onset of the big bad Monica Lewinsky scandal. And it turns out Clinton took a soft approach to the Cole attack because he didn't want the American public to think he was trying to steer attention away from him being an adulterer.

Also, the far left idiots running Moveon.org have a lot to thank for this. Their name came from their effort to "move on" American from the scandal. They originally began as Clinton backing group.

But, ol' Bumbling Bush comes along. Inherits the recession and the little nagging problem of Al Qaeda. Whammo! Instant scapegoat for the far left movers and shakers. See, they weren't done with the Clintons. Moveon stated openly they bought the Democratic party. That they would put Dem in the White House. So their golden child Bill is out of the game. They spend a few years supporting and grooming Hillary. And Hillary didn't always please her far left masters so they soon cut loose and now the far left, thus the media, and all the sheep of the world, support the rock and roll politician, Mr. Celebrity himself, Obama.

But they won't tell you this stuff. Nope. You have to sit back and filter countless news sources, including left or right leaning ones, and read lots of books and find your own truth. But most Americans won't. They turn to ABC, NBC and CNN for their daily guidance.

People need to wake up to this shit. Turn off the goddamn tv news. Stop letting ideologues pump your head full of stuff. Burn the semi-intellectual crap spewed by Michael Moore and the Loose Change Loons. It's all agenda driven ideology. America needs to think for itself again. And not with politicians, the media, and foreign nations putting the thoughts in your heads. Objectivity people!

And before anyone accuses me of being some blind Bush lover think again. I have my issues with the man. But I appreciate he has done something about terrorism. Which is far more than any left leaning or lib owned Dem will. And he did do good work with an Aids initiative in Africa. Even Obama gives him credit for that. He's dropped the ball on illegal immigrants and foreign policy. But show me a president who did every single function of their office and every crisis managed correctly in our history and I'll suck your cock.