The tranny porn that you won't watch.

[transmatic]

Originally Posted by smc

That makes sense to me. My question to transmatic wasn't intended as critical of him, but rather sought clarification of his meaning.

thank you smc for your question and thank you ila for your support

yes, i was talking about pretending and attempting to cheat viewer. i really hate porn with girls who are pretending that they are enjoying sex, who are bubbling all the time "oh! yes baby! that's cool! fuck me!". i just don't believe. please get me right ones again. i'm not against speaking during the sex. i'm against pleasure imitation.

what is cool about shemales - you never fake orgasm
you cum or not cum. straight girls always have, let say, hidden agenda do you know what i mean?

speaking about fake penises i didn't mean dildos. i meant imitation of transgendered girls, making up fake (but still quite real) penises on female's bodies. did you seen those loads of fake silicon sperm squirting from penis mock-ups? probably it's more about vintage videos. nowadays there are lot of really good porn. but you still can find those cheap tricks in the web.

so my opinion in two words: i love honest documentary, i love to see real emotions and passion and i never will watch any kind of imitation of sex

[incestus]

Hello to all,
Im new here and came here by accident... but I'm glad I found you all

I thought this might be a safe and easy topic to introduce my self while providing a little insight to "me"...

Like most "guys" porn is porn and it's all good (to an extent)... but I personally don't care at all for GG's in transgender porn... WHY? If I want to see a pretty girl fucked with a big dick I might as well watch main-stream porn. So I tend to pass on that content.

I also don't like completely non-functional (trying to avoid using dysfunctional for obvious reasons) transgendered "females" being in a traditional "female" role in porn. Again, if I just want to see a typical beef-cake fucking some girl in the ass... I'll refer to main-stream porn.

For me, it has to be a mutually active content. I don't mind seeking her suck him... as long as he sucks her... and I don't mind seeing him fuck her,.. as long as she can fuck him. THis is what I seek in my own personal encounters (with some exception) and it's what I prefer in my porn.

[smc]

Originally Posted by incestus

also don't like completely non-functional (trying to avoid using dysfunctional for obvious reasons) transgendered "females" being in a traditional "female" role in porn. Again, if I just want to see a typical beef-cake fucking some girl in the ass... I'll refer to main-stream porn.

I advise you strongly to read our thread about UNGENDERING and be careful about your use of quotation marks around the world "female."

[Bionca]

Originally Posted by smc

I advise you strongly to read our thread about UNGENDERING and be careful about your use of quotation marks around the world "female."

I'd say in this context the quotes are appropriate, since the word is used to identify a role played during sex rather than the person playing the role. Since sexual positions and social activities are arbitrarily divided between the sexes, even though that division breaks the second they are applied to people quotes seems to be a good way to make a point without reinforcing social conditioning that rarely actually works.

[incestus]

Originally Posted by Bionca

I'd say in this context the quotes are appropriate, since the word is used to identify a role played during sex rather than the person playing the role. Since sexual positions and social activities are arbitrarily divided between the sexes, even though that division breaks the second they are applied to people quotes seems to be a good way to make a point without reinforcing social conditioning that rarely actually works.

I can fully understand the need to be cautionary, and take no offense being a newcomer here.

It was reassuring however to see that my comments were interpreted correctly and I did not offend. Thank you Bionca

[incestus]

Originally Posted by smc

I advise you strongly to read our thread about UNGENDERING and be careful about your use of quotation marks around the world "female."

I have read the sticky regarding ungendering, and do apologize if the quotation marks around the word female was, could be, or might have been taken as sarcastic or derogatory. It was not intended in anyway to be perceived in that manor.
It was only implied towards the entire content of the sentence (regarding transgender/transexual titled and promoted porn with the transgendered person being completely passive in every respect) and not to be taken out of context for interpretation. Much like I used the quotation marks around guys in the previous sentiment.

I'll omit quotation marks in my future posts.

[smc]

Originally Posted by transmatic

thank you smc for your question and thank you ila for your support

yes, i was talking about pretending and attempting to cheat viewer. i really hate porn with girls who are pretending that they are enjoying sex, who are bubbling all the time "oh! yes baby! that's cool! fuck me!". i just don't believe. please get me right ones again. i'm not against speaking during the sex. i'm against pleasure imitation.

what is cool about shemales - you never fake orgasm
you cum or not cum. straight girls always have, let say, hidden agenda do you know what i mean?

speaking about fake penises i didn't mean dildos. i meant imitation of transgendered girls, making up fake (but still quite real) penises on female's bodies. did you seen those loads of fake silicon sperm squirting from penis mock-ups? probably it's more about vintage videos. nowadays there are lot of really good porn. but you still can find those cheap tricks in the web.

so my opinion in two words: i love honest documentary, i love to see real emotions and passion and i never will watch any kind of imitation of sex

And thank you for your clarification. I would suggest against making such broad generalizations such as "straight girls always have, let say, hidden agenda do you know what i mean?"

It may be YOUR personal experience, but "always" cannot possibly be correct.

[transmatic]

Originally Posted by smc

... I would suggest against making such broad generalizations such as "straight girls always have, let say, hidden agenda do you know what i mean?"

It may be YOUR personal experience, but "always" cannot possibly be correct.

haha i'm just kidding. i should probably say they have ABILITY to hide their real emotions, simulate orgasm and sexual arousal. it is not ALWAYS of course

i'm not against something or somebody in general. my idea is that penis is far more obvious marker of excitement than vagina. that's why (not only why, of coarse ) i like shemales