Bailey Jay is a bust.

[Sigma]

I admit her product does sell. However, I'll explain everything again to answer your question.

What I meant by unwatchable is the video quality and the angles. Like I said in the Op the videos looked like amateur porn. In her POV videos the cameraman has the camera viewed at her back so all we see is her skin.........

It is impossible to see if people are "voting" by renewing their memberships. The Tgirl Network features over ten sites with girls such as Kimber James, Vanity, Foxxxy, etc. The network has many top girls that some members maybe more interested in them than Bailey. However, people can join Bailey site at a lower cost by only buying access to Bailey's site. That's the only way to judge how many people are actually pleased with her product.

I just login the Tgirl Network to see the ratings of Bailey's POV hardcore movies. All of them have high ratings. The problem is there is no number of voters listed. It is impossible to say how many people voted.

I do know one thing for a fact. A lot of members made complaints about the quality and she no longer allows members to post comments. No other girl on the Tgirl Network has done this.

I have also downloaded her scene with Sarina. The video quality has slight improved. The quality of her scene is still subpar to the other girls of the Tgirl Network.

At the end of the day quality is subjective. What I see as quality will be different then other people. Quality is judged by what people WANT. It does not matter if someone is in the majority or minority it will be judged by what the group wants.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

At the end of the day quality is subjective. What I see as quality will be different then other people. Quality is judged by what people WANT. It does not matter if someone is in the majority or minority it will be judged by what the group wants.

You ought to do a little bit more exploration of what the word "quality" actually means.

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by smc

You ought to do a little bit more exploration of what the word "quality" actually means.

Once again you completely avoided the subject at hand. I'm done with talking to you. You can't even debate. All you do is trying to demand how I criticize people.

Quality is based on the CONSUMERS' expectations. Not every consumer has the same expectations of a product. That is SUBJECTIVE.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

Once again you completely avoided the subject at hand. I'm done with talking to you. You can't even debate. All you do is trying to demand how I criticize people.

Quality is based on the CONSUMERS' expectations. Not every consumer has the same expectations of a product. That is SUBJECTIVE.

My response was reasonable. The subject is quality and that's what I wrote about. A significant part of any discourse is about ensuring that both sides understand terminology the same way and correctly. You don't like that I do that, so you falsely turn it into: "All you do is trying to demand how I criticize people."

Nevertheless, product quality has to do with the features and characteristics of a product that contribute to its ability to meed given requirements. Many of those requirements are subjective, and can only be measured by the individual. For instance, as ridiculous as it may seem, one might argue that red hair is a requirement on a pornstar and that a pornstar with brown hair, consequently, does not meet a quality standard. Again, it's a ridiculous use of the word "quality" but it is not incorrect, technically. However, some of those requirements are NOT subjective. In a car, the ability to meet standardized measures of braking ability or fuel economy, etc., are not subjective (the creation of the standard may be, but the meeting of it as a measure of quality is objective). That's all I said.