shemale anal orgasm

[sosed]

I think I get it, what you want to say. It seems it take some time to me. Improper word could change a meaning, which is not meant and I could not see it. If there is a way to change "natural" with "normal", than the meaning could be more correct.

[smc]

Originally Posted by sosed

I think I get it, what you want to say. It seems it take some time to me. Improper word could change a meaning, which is not meant and I could not see it. If there is a way to change "natural" with "normal", than the meaning could be more correct.

NO, you really don't get it. NORMAL would be an even worse word choice than NATURAL -- unless that's what you mean, in which case I think you have a lot of explaining to do to the transwomen that you call "dear" in an earlier post.

[sosed]

Huh, now you find me in this linguistic trap of meanings. It is hard to say which word is proper here. By biology rules of males and females are different and I just want to explain, that processes in female and male brains are different. Every person is unicum and his/her desires are natural and normal. I think this sentence must be deleted, because it could make too much harm, where it is not needed.

[smc]

Originally Posted by sosed

Huh, now you find me in this linguistic trap of meanings. It is hard to say which word is proper here. By biology rules of males and females are different and I just want to explain, that processes in female and male brains are different. Every person is unicum and his/her desires are natural and normal. I think this sentence must be deleted, because it could make too much harm, where it is not needed.

It's really quite simple. Forget the "biology rules" -- those have been subverted by the desire to assign definitiveness to gender roles. Here's what matters for our discussion. Do you want to state that a female who has the sexual desire to penetrate and impregnate is UNNATURAL or ABNORMAL, or do you accept that these desires in a female are as NATURAL and NORMAL as they are in a male? Conversely, do you accept that a male's desire to be penetrated is perfectly NATURAL and NORMAL? I hope so, because I think about being penetrated every single day, and you don't want to be suggesting that I am unnatural or abnormal, now, do you?

[ila]

Originally Posted by smc

It's really quite simple. Forget the "biology rules" -- those have been subverted by the desire to assign definitiveness to gender roles. Here's what matters for our discussion. Do you want to state that a female who has the sexual desire to penetrate and impregnate is UNNATURAL or ABNORMAL, or do you accept that these desires in a female are as NATURAL and NORMAL as they are in a male? Conversely, do you accept that a male's desire to be penetrated is perfectly NATURAL and NORMAL? I hope so, because I think about being penetrated every single day, and you don't want to be suggesting that I am unnatural or abnormal, now, do you?

It's a linguistic trap. Never ask a question with a negative in it as can be interpreted in one of two ways. The originator and receiver will most likely interpret it in opposite ways and hence also misinterpret the answer.

[smc]

Originally Posted by ila

It's a linguistic trap. Never ask a question with a negative in it as can be interpreted in one of two ways. The originator and receiver will most likely interpret it in opposite ways and hence also misinterpret the answer.

What trap? The OP implied by omission that something was unnatural or abnormal, and I take issue with that. He was given ample opportunity to clarify and did not.

[ila]

Originally Posted by smc

What trap? The OP implied by omission that something was unnatural or abnormal, and I take issue with that. He was given ample opportunity to clarify and did not.

The linguistic trap was in your question that I put in bold in the quote. You asked a question with a negative in it. A question with a negative will usually lead to confusion in the answer.