Pretty Boys

[xselomon]

so want to loook like this

[xselomon]

or was it this? Androgny Finery. fin

[linguslingus]

Love that bent over one waiting for the dildo on the bed!

[Corky]

All these femboys are so cute! Love this thread.

[Bimini]

Originally Posted by xselomon

or was it this? Androgny Finery. fin

Initially I saw the androgynous blond a couple of postings up and thought he was probably a gay boi, and that conclusion was boosted by the pic with the brown-haired androgynous guy. But on closer look he/she is further down the road, past androgony, with eyes skillfully made up and lips plumped up with collagen. Then the clincher was the shot with her in the dress. Clearly however, she has a ways to go. I'd love to coach her along and make sure she is well trained in the oral (top/bottom) and anal (bottom) arts, and make sure she also has a good course of hormones and testosterone blockers. In six months, she would have stopped making tadpoles and once she has reached that point of no return, castration would hasten the process. Natural boobs (not too big) with nice plump nipples and a medium size (tuckable, if for the most part soft) cock would complete the picture...and qualify her as a really hot model, both on the Web and mainstream.

[tunafish]

this thread is a gold mine..awesome thanks..just a problem:many of these "pretty boys" are at least traps for me so i dont consider them as boys..beyond definitions they're hot

[tunafish]

because i'm not very into definitions and etiquette on the web,just a questions for the girls right there:somebody is calling "boys" the shemales (or ts)..that's not a bit offensive?
(sorry if i make mistakes on definitions but in real life i only use the words "transvestite or crossdresser=still a male but with female clothes","shemale or transsexual=a very large group for me","ladyboy=asian trans" and recently i've learned "trap=for me the step between tv and ts")
is it correct?

[tunafish]

gay-boy-twink-fistng-anal-finger-dildo-ass013.jpg

206.jpg

0_962.jpg

[cumshooter69]

Originally Posted by tunafish

Attachment 242861

Attachment 242862

Attachment 242863

WOW..the pretty boy in the 3rd picture is freakin HOTT

[littlesuzy]

Originally Posted by tunafish

it's true the only important thing is the self identity..and maybe some photos would fit better in femboys or just "shemale things" anyway if they are good no problem i think
and yes the boy is very pretty..

I think he's hot !

[smc]

Originally Posted by tunafish

because i'm not very into definitions and etiquette on the web,just a questions for the girls right there:somebody is calling "boys" the shemales (or ts)..that's not a bit offensive?
(sorry if i make mistakes on definitions but in real life i only use the words "transvestite or crossdresser=still a male but with female clothes","shemale or transsexual=a very large group for me","ladyboy=asian trans" and recently i've learned "trap=for me the step between tv and ts")
is it correct?

There is a lot of confusion and controversy over terms. The most important thing to remember is that the individual's self-identity is what matters most. In fact, it is all that matters. Hence, when people have posted models who clearly identify as women and referred to them as crossdressers, they have been corrected (and reprimanded, if the need arises).

There is a "Femboys" thread that has many of what you call "traps." It existed long before I joined this site; had I had a say in its creation, I would have argued for a different title. In fact, I would change the name of this site, since the term "ladyboy" sows such confusion (see below).

Personally, I think this "Pretty Boys" thread should have no models other than those who clearly identify as boys, but who happen to be "pretty" (which, in most cases, tends on this site to mean they have "feminine" features).

Also personally, I do not think that any model from the various sites with "ladyboy" in their name belong in this thread (e.g., the one posted just above. While it is true that "boy" is part of that characterization, it is the case that this is more a language/translation issue than it is a genuine gender identity. I submit that most Asians who call themselves ladyboys would, if they were native English speakers, not use that term. This is based only on some empirical evidence, but I am confident that it would hold under rigorous scrutiny.

[amy/cd]

we can't always know how these people "self-identify" but that also raises another problem: perhaps they change how they self-identify. pictures from one time period my reflect one self-identity while pictures of the same person from another time may reflect another. how are we to sort this out?

if the model complains about how they are categorized then fair enough - if not then how do we know?

Originally Posted by smc

There is a lot of confusion and controversy over terms. The most important thing to remember is that the individual's self-identity is what matters most. In fact, it is all that matters. Hence, when people have posted models who clearly identify as women and referred to them as crossdressers, they have been corrected (and reprimanded, if the need arises).

There is a "Femboys" thread that has many of what you call "traps." It existed long before I joined this site; had I had a say in its creation, I would have argued for a different title. In fact, I would change the name of this site, since the term "ladyboy" sows such confusion (see below).

Personally, I think this "Pretty Boys" thread should have no models other than those who clearly identify as boys, but who happen to be "pretty" (which, in most cases, tends on this site to mean they have "feminine" features).

Also personally, I do not think that any model from the various sites with "ladyboy" in their name belong in this thread (e.g., the one posted just above. While it is true that "boy" is part of that characterization, it is the case that this is more a language/translation issue than it is a genuine gender identity. I submit that most Asians who call themselves ladyboys would, if they were native English speakers, not use that term. This is based only on some empirical evidence, but I am confident that it would hold under rigorous scrutiny.

[smc]

Originally Posted by amy/cd

we can't always know how these people "self-identify" but that also raises another problem: perhaps they change how they self-identify. pictures from one time period my reflect one self-identity while pictures of the same person from another time may reflect another. how are we to sort this out?

if the model complains about how they are categorized then fair enough - if not then how do we know?

Of course, you are correct: we can't always know. But taking some care with posts goes a long way. For instance, as I wrote, if the picture comes from "Shemale Yum" (which would be clearly indicated on the picture itself), we should assume that the model is not a "pretty boy." In addition, women with obvious breasts are not crossdressers. Yet, people have posted such pictures in this and the Femboys thread!

[manhasso]

van burnham