Bailey Jay is a bust.

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by smc

You have now elevated yourself to the master level on this site of people who run from what they say, don't take responsibility for the actual words they use, and hide behind "opinion."

There is a debate. You hide behind the fact that you're not "winning" by trying to change the subject.

I am clearly winning the debate because NO one has spoken about the topic. Instead members are upset that I criticized one of their favorites.

[rockabilly]

To be fair Bailey is just getting started , she does her guy scenes POV to give her guy fans the illusion of being the guy fucking her ... and while it limits what positions are used it does have perks. And nothing ruins a good jerk more than when the cam is on the girl then jumps to the dudes face! Nooooooo focus the cam on her dammit !

She will improve w/ time and bigger budgets.

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by rockabilly

To be fair Bailey is just getting started , she does her guy scenes POV to give her guy fans the illusion of being the guy fucking her ... and while it limits what positions are used it does have perks. And nothing ruins a good jerk more than when the cam is on the girl then jumps to the dudes face! Nooooooo focus the cam on her dammit !

She will improve w/ time and bigger budgets.

The problem with this is the fact that the other SMC girls had good video quality in their early videos. It seems odd that Bailey could not get someone to film good quality.

Does every guy scene have to be in POV? Isn't the point of porn is to fantasize regardless of the video style? I don't like POV scenes. Although I would not mind if not all of her guy scenes were POV. The other SMC girls do have POV, they also have regular view porn as well for their members.

[Tread]

Sigma, you are allowed to purchase a product or a service. You can only choose if you want it or not. You own nobody and can?t dictate anybody because you are a paying member. You can voice your wishes, but don?t bash on something because you prefer it different.

I think your whole complaining threads sound a bit like this:
There is a major problem in my town, there are way too less restaurants where you can get quality food.
The steak house is a totally bust, because you have to wait a long time until I get my food and no drive in counter.
The Frenchman is totally overrated, because they have so much courses, knifes, forks and spoons. And you get nothing in a bun.
The Indian (the one from Asia) is a totally hole, everything is so spicy, and you don?t get beef.
The Japanese is a wash-out, they sell cold rice products and even raw fish. There is absolutely nothing with cheese.
The Italian is a flop. They make too much pasta, and the pizza is too big. They have to sell something in a handy bag.
The big problem stays: There are not enough restaurants, and most are foreigners.
Only the fast food burgers are good. But there are only five fast food chains here and one of them sells only friggin chicken.

[JodieTs]

Originally Posted by Tread

Sigma,
I think your whole complaining threads sound a bit like this:
There is a major problem in my town, there are way too less restaurants where you can get quality food.
The steak house is a totally bust, because you have to wait a long time until I get my food and no drive in counter.
The Frenchman is totally overrated, because they have so much courses, knifes, forks and spoons. And you get nothing in a bun.
The Indian (the one from Asia) is a totally hole, everything is so spicy, and you don?t get beef.
The Japanese is a wash-out, they sell cold rice products and even raw fish. There is absolutely nothing with cheese.
The Italian is a flop. They make too much pasta, and the pizza is too big. They have to sell something in a handy bag.
The big problem stays: There are not enough restaurants, and most are foreigners.
Only the fast food burgers are good. But there are only five fast food chains here and one of them sells only friggin chicken.

Brilliant!
I nominate this for post of the week.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

I am clearly winning the debate because NO one has spoken about the topic. Instead members are upset that I criticized one of their favorites.

Not a single one of my comments has anything to do with whether Bailey Jay is one of my favorites or whether I have any interest in her whatsoever. It is about what you write and how you present your "opinions." The actual content is secondary.

As aw9725 put it ...