| 
 | |||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Today's Posts | Search | Bookmark & Share  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods 2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state "Government ownership and administrationship" hmm, does that sound familiar (banks, mortgage firms, automobile companies, wall street, the medical industry, need I go on)?  The unSupreme Court's decision on obamacare(if it's such a gerat system then why are they [government workers] and unions exempt?) was not Constitutional.  That's not simply my opinion, that's what the document says.  I ask youl where in the Constitution does it empower the Federal government to run health care?  Where in the Constitution does it empower the unSupreme Court to change the wording of existing legislation? One further question, if it is deemed Constitutional for the Federal government to "tax" people for not getting health insurance then what will be next? Will they "tax" anyone who fails to buy a new Chevy hybrid? 
				__________________ Just because I'm telling you this story doesn't mean that I'm alive at the end of it. If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. DEO VINDICE | 
| 
 |  |