kmi1 -
OK, so you quoted an entire paragraph where I was talking about guys who like domination porn. That paragraph began:
Quote:
Originally Posted by racquel
A lot of guys like being submissive now and then...
|
Then you responded quite eloquently with:
Quote:
Originally Posted by km1
Have to disagree with a lot of this. I'd post a whole wack of vids to prove myself right, but I'd get banned.
|
You didn't explain what you disagreed with. Perhaps you're talking about my statement that genetic females seem much more inept at domination and much more inept at fucking people with strap-ons than shemales are at fucking people with their penises. Well, that's your opinion, and maybe you have a video of a giggly tranny who can't get it up to support your position. Obviously there is lesbian porn out there that is legitimately hot and not a joke. But most lesbian porn -- including a few entire series that I've seen many parts of -- are basically ridiculous. The only genetic girl-on-girl stuff I've seen that flips my cookie at all is very few videos, mostly ones with Belladonna. Well, I like that old retro artsy almost soft-core Michael Ninn stuff, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by km1
Did I say I don't think a lot of guys don't like being submissive? No, where does this come from?
|
No, you didn't. You didn't say
anything about what you disagreed with, and as we can all remember from 5th-grade English class, the first sentence of a paragraph is generally a summary of said paragraph, and I assumed that was the essence of what you were disagreeing with. Hence the confusion we're currently having. If you'd like to contribute, please do, but it appears you're more interested in arguing about nothing than actually saying something.