Barack Obama

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by TheAngryPostman

A force of mostly US troops would be seen as a cover for clandestine operations, just like people believe that the invasion of Iraq was only for oil. If it was a multinational force mostly comprised of UN peacekeepers with the US in the rear rather than spearheading the operations, military action would be a bit more palateable, people would be alot less suspicious of why we went there and it would make Zero look like Jesus Christ:Teamplayer.

The UN couldn't scratch its ass without the US showing the way. When have they taken the lead against any country? The US has always had to do what is necessary with or without the international community because we're usually the ones who can get the job done. The UK has the right stuff too.