|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fear the government that fears our guns. We (not me) have elected a man who does not believe in our Constitution.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Invading random countries under the pretense of a total lie that they had weapons which they didn't have, and continuing a war for 6 years without even having a stated purpose, that's defending the Constitution? Doubling the size of government, doubling government spending, exponentially increasing the power of the executive branch, that's defending the Constitution? You're a genius! Of course Obama's the real threat to the Constitution! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
RACHEL:
What is the big deal about guns? Protection w/ regard to your specific situation? Besides, what about the right of forming militias, because 200 years ago we had a small army and a sheriff? Piece, TAL |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is a very big deal to 60 million Americans. And it's not just about the Second Amendment. It's about ALL the Amendments. If they manage to take that one away which one will be next?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What about ALL the constitutional abortions of the current occupant of The WH? Like wiretapping? From what I've heard Army guys cannot refer to their rifle as a gun. If they make that mistake in boot camp, they have to run naked around the base w/ one hand holding their rifle, and the other holding their cock. They have to sing this is my rifle, this is my gun; this is for shooting, this is for fun. Piece, TAL |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Those 2 were not rhetorical questions. Piece, TAL |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
j/k I'm only trying to inject a bit of my warped sense of humour. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well that sucks. My IQ was only 147 when I took the test.
![]() IQ is a joke, though, and I've certainly never brought up my IQ to try and defend my position on anything. You could have an IQ of 200 if you were 6 and tested at a 12-year-old level, but you could spend the rest of your life not learning a thing, so then you're a "genius" who's as smart as a 12-year-old. As far as your statements are concerned, it doesn't matter what you got on any IQ test. Your logic is flawed. How can you even bring up the Constitution and defend Bush? They could ban all guns today and it still wouldn't be as gross a violation of the Constitution as the Patriot Act was. For the record, I live in Dayton, Ohio, and I keep a 20-gauge by my bed and often carry a 9mm. If you actually look at what the 2nd Ammendment is saying, though, it's not really about personal protection. It's about average citizens being armed to protect a "free state," meaning the tyranny of a corrupt government. I certainly don't agree with the theory that the 2nd Amendment doesn't apply because we don't need a militia. All politicians are corrupt, but certainly Obama can't be as corrupt as Bush. You are a complete fool if you thought it was a good idea to vote for a Republican who is OK with Bush burning the entire Constitution just because you think Obama wants to take your guns away. That is not true. Obama has never spoken out for gun control. He never made much of an issue out of it. When he was pressed to make a statement, Obama said: "I think it's important for us to recognize that we've got a tradition of handgun ownership and gun ownership generally. And a lot of law-abiding citizens use it for hunting, for sportsmanship, and for protecting their families. We also have a violence on the streets that is the result of illegal handgun usage. And so I think there is nothing wrong with a community saying we are going to take those illegal handguns off the streets. And cracking down on the various loopholes that exist in terms of background checks for children, the mentally ill. We can have reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respect the Second Amendment and people's traditions." Gun control isn't the most important issue in the world. In case you didn't notice, we actually have less gun control than we had a few years ago. Obama is for the states having control over gun issues, and it is because of that kind of a policy that I was able to get a carry permit in Ohio. So I've got four guns, I've got 33-round magazines for them, I've got hollow-point ammo that isn't legal to use in a war but is legal for me to carry. My shotgun is basically sawed-off, with an 18" barrel and a pistol grip, and that's perfectly legal. It cost me $75 for a concealed carry permit. A friend of mine just told me that it only cost him $200 to get a permit to use a silencer. Who the hell needs that??? But it's legal. And you're worried about gun control? Then go buy an assault rifle while you can, psycho. Of course, I think people who say Obama is going to fix all the problems in the country are totally ignorant, too, but that's a different story... Quote:
You honestly think Bush didn't do anything wrong? He started a war! He started a war under a totally false pretense. He put people in charge like Rumsfeld who directly defied the Pentagon over and over again when they told him what they would have to do to accomplish anything in Iraq. He supported people like Cheney who funneled most of the money going to Iraq into a company which he owns stock in. He demanded that this recent $2 trillion in handouts would have absolutely no oversight and nobody can be prosecuted for using those funds illegally. You want to talk about destroying the Constitution? Do you know what an interpretive signing statement is? Basically, every time Congress passes a bill and gives it to Bush, he doesn't just pass it. He doesn't just veto it (then they could push it through with another vote). He rewrites it himself with a signing statement, which amounts to him interpreting it himself and saying that anything he doesn't like doesn't apply. Bush has written over 100 signing statements re-interpreting over 1,000 laws. Quote:
![]() Seriously, I'm amazed at the ability of people with an agenda to be in complete denial about reality. Last edited by racquel; 12-09-2008 at 12:19 AM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow that was some essay. You must have been the smartest person in jail.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Carry on with your discussion, but stop the derogatory comments about each other.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
IQ.
Half the people are below average.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey! She started it with the name calling not me! Glad I got in the knockout shot though lol
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It wasn't just a lie; it was using 9/11 to justify the action, while portraying dissenters like myself as anti-American traitors. Plus, Chaney, Rummy & Wolfie drew up a paper in 1997 that said the only way to attack Iraq, and get Saddam--to finish what was started in '91--was for a Pearl Harbor type attack to occur. BTW, that 3rd one wasn't puffy to me, it was enticingly innocent. More Kisses for you, TAL |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|