An interesting question

[transjen]

Gee wasn't this question already asked a short time ago? I don't think you're gay, for one thing i think and act like a girl so therefore any guy that likes me likes girls plain and simple. I consider myself female and almost every other Tgirls considers themselves female so your not gay Jennifer

[Land_of_dogs]

Okay, I feel better now, thanks.

[Bionca]

Gay.. not gay... the #1 question and mind-fuck for guys who like gals like me.

First, does it matter if you are gay?

Second, it would depend on how you view people like me, am I a guy with tits, or a woman with a penis (I have my own answer to that one)?

My answer to your question: Human sexuality is complicated and vague and always changing. Labels are good for a kind of mental shorthand, but fail when applied to real people in a real world.

[Bionca]

Forgot to add... as far as most people in they world care - yes, you are gay gay GAY.

[Howsoon]

One day there will be a world which won't care if you're gay, straight, bi, curious or an elephant!!

[cyba]

..yes, you are gay gay GAY

Or - bi, bi, BI?
That needs clarification too. It appears that most guys who are attracted to LBs are not attracted to guys. LBs, themselves, state that from their experience of guys, as do lots of guys on this forum, and elsewhere. They're adamant. But then there's the question of 'cock' or, particularly, that strange allure of feminity-plus-cock. Cock is definitely in there. Read the posts. It's 'writ' pretty large. Strictly speaking, 'bi' means 'swinging both ways' - guys and girls. But LB-loving guys state they're not interested in screwing or sucking or fondling a male. So, in that sense, they're not bi. But no bio - um, 'bi-o' - female has a cock and 'straight' guys state they're only interested in one thing -'pussy' (and a relationship with women which may or may not lead to marriage and children and a life of domestic bliss - which is not meant to imply that solid, quality relationships can't happen between LBs/TGs and non-gay guys or that, some time in the future, if not now, they might, if they wish adopt a child (a politico-ethical tangle).)
So where are we with our terms?
The extra difficulty is, guys also make the comment here that they're not interested in LBs who have 'trans-gendered', i.e. no longer have a cock which, again, points to that appendage being fundamentally important to them.
Here's another question - what if you found a 'bio' (for want of a better expression) woman with a clitoris 4-5-6 inches long which had a glans just like a penis. No balls, of course. Would that person do?
My guess is - no..it's not a guy.

[Mr.Curious]

I am turned on by LBs but not by men. I dont know if it is a "fetish" or what to call it, my fiance insists im bi, but i dont realy agree.

[TheSkronkDonkey]

Originally Posted by Bionca

Forgot to add... as far as most people in they world care - yes, you are gay gay GAY.

LOL!

Oh, Bionca. You have opened Pandora's Box there! :D

I agree, by the way.

If labels *are* just labels, and if people are inclined to use them as people generally do, then we're ALL gay.

I don't know why people have such a struggle over this issue. Bruce Lee: "truth exists outside all molds; pattern and awareness is never exclusive."

[Talvenada]

Originally Posted by Bionca

Forgot to add... as far as most people in they world care - yes, you are gay gay GAY.

L-DOG:

Just pulling your chain, dude.

You're on the hetero side of bi, and you move closer to bi by degrees of interest and physical activity. True bi is sleeping w/ both sexes equally, and that means dudes as dudes. Only being turned on by t-girls w/o any physical contact makes you a bi-curious hetero.

[twistedone]

Well said Bionca.

My only desire is that she enjoys me, as much as I enjoy her.

Originally Posted by Bionca

Gay.. not gay... the #1 question and mind-fuck for guys who like gals like me.

First, does it matter if you are gay?

Second, it would depend on how you view people like me, am I a guy with tits, or a woman with a penis (I have my own answer to that one)?

My answer to your question: Human sexuality is complicated and vague and always changing. Labels are good for a kind of mental shorthand, but fail when applied to real people in a real world.

[cyba]

I like your reply, racquel.

Gay porn registered as a threat response as though the viewer's life was actually in danger from witnessing gay sex

That makes sense, especially the last bit. Until recently, gay males were
illegitimized (they may still be) by the dominant hetero-sexual culture whose 'psycho-biology' is powerfully procreative and states, outright, that anything else is 'unnatural'..and..'you'll burn in hell (religion.)'
I can easily imagine some poor student, or other, feeling panic and stress when his brain pleasure centre lights up in the lab and his nob twitches while watching guys (or ladyboys) having it off. It's a public event. He might not feel the same reaction in the privacy of his own or some other person's room.

Edit

One day there will be a world which won't care if you're gay, straight, bi, curious or an elephant!!

Maybe, Howsoon. That's what it will take.

[randolph]

Hi everyone,
The story at shemale stories that I wrote (Charlie and Khloe) has a proposed solution to the human male - female dilemma. Check it out.
Randolph

[sexy]

Personally, I wouldn't stress about it - the most important thing to me is to focus on what makes you happy. I love looking at LBs, but don't ever look at men - I don't worry about whether I am gay, bi, straight, whatever, I just enjoy my sexuality.