|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share  |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
09-17-2008
|
||||
|
||||
I hate...
- fags. Not gays but those obscenely over the top I'm-gonna-shove-my-homosexuality-down-your-fucking-throat types. - bourgeoisie. - Australia. Seriously fuck Australia. - New England. - Self-deceptive people. - Reality television. - Most television. - AM radio. - Star Trek: Deep Space 9. - Sobriety. - People with zero capacity to understand the vapidity of contemporary music. - millions of other things.
__________________
This was Coldharbour, where Molag Bal was Prince. It appeared to Zenas as if it were a future Nirn, under the King of Rape, desolate and barren, filled with suffering. I could hear Morian Zenas weep at the images he saw, and shiver at the sight of the Imperial Palace, spattered with blood and excrement. 
|
|
#3
09-17-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hate...
...slow sunday drivers ...to sweat ...ignorant people ..."over the top" flamboyant annoying gay guys ...rude people ...Dealmaker Drum Honda...well, just about all Watertown Dealerships ...not being able to think of anything else that I hate...
__________________
"Crossdressing men, with a little discretion and a lot of anxiety, can pass as normal and retain all the privilege of their birthright. They don't have to tell anyone they are wearing lacy panties under their jeans." Helen Boyd
|
|
#4
09-17-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hate;
1. People that think that since I love shemales, I'm gay. Get a clue will ya. 2. People that mistreat people, including spouses and children. I especially hate child molesters 3. Politicians. The only agenda they are after is their own. No exceptions. Better stop here, I'll be here all night. LOL
|
|
#5
09-18-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hate...
- slow drivers - stupid people - country/rap/R&B music - needless bureaucracy - not being a shemale - hyper-happy people - commercials - hot, humid weather - mosquitoes & fire ants - the bible-belt mentality - being married to someone I have nothing in common with
__________________
A lesbian trapped in a man's body
|
|
#6
09-20-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right-wingers, narrow minds (redundant, sorry), waiting in line and socalled str8 folks with an attitude...
__________________
- I cherish the fact that the girls I date are braver than I
|
|
#7
09-20-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That in and of itself is narrow minded, binary us vs them, partisan politics. http://www.lewrockwell.com/wilson-jl...n-james29.html
|
|
#8
09-20-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
09-20-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
H
__________________
- I cherish the fact that the girls I date are braver than I
|
|
#10
09-20-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think the political parties in the US are confused (I know, big surprise). Someone who is a devout christian, as many republicans claim to be, would seem to me to be in favor of socialism and welfare. i.e. love your neighbor as yourself. There are many examples of Jesus spreading the wealth. So that doesn't make sense to me. An atheist would typically be a democrat. But republican's fiscal conservatism and capitalism want government to stay out of the way and let economic competition drive the market. Survival of the fittest. This is most like darwinism, which atheists understand. I align my self with whatever policies from whatever party make sense. As for being a shemale, I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body. If I were a woman with a cock (a shemale) I could be what I find most attractive, and still make love to my lover.
__________________
A lesbian trapped in a man's body
|
|
#11
10-02-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
_██_ (ಠ_ృ) I say they seem to be letting all SORTS of riff raff into the internet these days!
|
|
#12
10-02-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
i hate being single
i hate my country being over run by arabs indians and muslims i hate stupid people i hate living in a corrupt world
__________________
_██_ (ಠ_ృ) I say they seem to be letting all SORTS of riff raff into the internet these days!
|
|
#14
11-09-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
11-09-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
to Creative Mind, first just want to clear things up because you referred to me as a her, I'm a guy. Secondly, I would argue that a Federal supreme court law would override state legislation, if I remember correctly there were federal level supreme court rulings that overturned state legislation in regards to the black civil rights movements when blacks had the right to vote essentially taken away from them again after the 13th amendment was passed. Also in the time period of Jim Crow Laws where the idea was "seperate but equal," I beleive supreme court rulings ultimately changed the legality of those particular state legislations.
|
|
#16
11-09-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And my big apologies for the mistaken reference! I was typing fast and didn't even catch that, so sorry again.... As for this question that you're bringing up -- namely, who technically outranks who and whose legal judgment supersedes who -- you're basically right BECAUSE of the example you're citing. In short, the Supreme Court (in Washington) can't step in and overrule the California State Supreme Court or the toss out the will of the California voters IF this is perceived as state ballot measure. IF this is seen as an issue that the people of the state should have every right to self-determine for themselves. On the other hand, the Supreme Court could step in IF the case was truly framed...and IF the Supreme Court agreed to hear it...AS an actual civil rights issue. Much like you said, THAT is something you could take all the way to the top IF the Supreme Court bought into the argument that same-sex marriage is somehow, in some way, analogous to something like the Black civil rights movement. But that's the big question here. As I pointed out in my post, those in the gay community certainly feel that way. And yet the reason that Prop 8 won in California...and similar amendments won in other states on Election Day by even WIDER margins of support...is because many people don't feel this is a civil rights issue. Polls show that a majority of Americans feel that so long as same-sex couples have civil unions readily available to them, they have no right to bitch. Simply because a civil union will ultiimately safeguard and protect their legal rights. In other words, as you often hear this phrased, same-sex couples can be together...they can get married...they just can't use the WORD "married" in describing themselves. Which to many makes the whole debate seem rather silly at times -- well, that is until people from either side start whipping out their long list of reasons why that one simple word, marriage, carries SO much weight and importance. To those in the gay community, "marriage" signifies a more clearly defined legal status and ensures them full-on rights. And it gives them a greater emotional satisfaction because now they feel as though their relationship is a validated part of society. On the other hand, those against same-sex marriage argue that civil unions DO give same-sex couples the same legal rights as a married couple, so what are we fighting about? Stop bitching about the word "marriage" and move on. They argue that even as a word "marriage" is based on religion, so that takes it out of the legal arena. Or taking this a step further, they argue it's not right for the Vatican and the Catholic Church to say "Same-sex marriage is wrong. We don't allow this in our church. This goes against the very principles that makes us Catholics" only to have the U.S. government step in and say "Well, we've decided that we're going to now TELL YOU how you have to run your churches and THIS is what you'll have to believe in from now on." So like I said, it ALL comes down to the million dollar question: Do you think same-sex marriage is a civil rights issue...or do you think it's splitting hairs over a word, that the same legal rights are already available in a civil union, at which point this really is a religious debate or a sexual orientation debate which the government has no business sticking its nose into? And that's why each side is now desperately fighting to "frame" the entire argument in a certain way. Because whoever wins THAT fight will ultimately determine WHICH court (State vs. Federal) gets to hear these issues and rule on them...
|
|
#17
05-29-2009
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well, what else do I hate ? * I' ve lost my f#cking job * Saddam is dead, but they're still fucking Iraq * My car is still broken ( yeah, blame Osama) * Fat Pizza series ended up ( blame Frech people) * My knees are aching ( blame.. umm.. eskimos ) * I'm gaining weight ( blame McDonald's even if I don' t eat there) * Some blokes owe me some money ( blame seagulls eventhough they have nothing to do with this) * I don' t remember all the things I hate ( blame Canada) * I' m still a virgin ( Gawwd bless G.Bush administration)
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do U Like Christmas Or Hate? | LuvAmy | General Discussion | 19 | 09-14-2009 08:20 PM |
| Hate to do this as my first thread but who is this? | GHawk | ID help needed | 5 | 03-30-2009 05:11 AM |
Long live the ladyboys
Hybrid Mode
