Bigmouth

[Ogryn1313]

I'm skeptical of any information found online. Like Wikepedia. Too easily manipulated and edited.

[SluttyShemaleAnna]

Originally Posted by Ogryn1313

I'm skeptical of any information found online. Like Wikepedia. Too easily manipulated and edited.

You clearly never read the talk pages on wikipedia. lol, the manipulation is far from easy ;P

[Ogryn1313]

Easy or difficult is irrelevant. The fact remains it is manipulated frequently sassy pants.

[SluttyShemaleAnna]

Originally Posted by Ogryn1313

Easy or difficult is irrelevant. The fact remains it is manipulated frequently sassy pants.

Seriously read the talk pages on a major artice, untill you do, you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, and your no better than what your complaining about, just parroting the same line someone parroted to you.

anyway, anyone who uses an encyclopaedia as a primary source is a muppet, even if it's Britannica or something, encyclopaedias are not valid sources. Any high quality Wikipedia article will have something in the order of 100 references, which is hte whole point of an encyclopaedia, to provide you with a beginning pint to your research.

[Ogryn1313]

Who said I haven't read them? Who says I rely on encyclopedias? I don't recall. You sure do like to grasp at straws and read into things.