ARE you or are you not?

[ziggybabie]

Originally Posted by TheSkronkDonkey

I agree with Bionca. Labels are bad enough; having to ask yourself what label you might fit out of fear and confusion is even worse.

There are few -- if any -- absolutes in life. Just ride with it. A tolerance for ambiguity is the sign of a healthy mind and healthy society.

I agree 100%. Some people placing too much stock in labels and one-sided group politics or group thought to large degrees is also another problem that's wrong with the world in general. Speaking off topic.

[ziggybabie]

I use the word "bi" a lot. Even on my public myspace, I'm listed as "not sure" on my orientation, but say I'm somewhat "bi/pansexual/hetero-flexible but heteroromantic".

I love the female body. I also love the bigger bulkier male body. Especially the larger muscular form. But with guys, the cock is the most important part. I do love guys who are big enough to manhandle my little ass, as tops.

My main attraction is women. I'm mostly bottom with guys, only going with guys who pack 7 or more inches.

I can be either with a shemale but prefer being a bottom. Same size thing applies.

With guys, it's a lot rarer that I'm attracted to their facial features and whole package or I'd stop if I seen them on the street (unless they're a bodybuilder or something. lol). But, I'd def top for some dragboys. 100% males who just look cute as little girls.

I love shemales as I see the "best of both worlds".

The "bi" thing still does feel funny, because I don't see guys on the average in clubs. movies, etc and think "he's cute" like I do with women.

Some would call that "straight but kinky". I just use "bi" because it simplifies it.

[chrisraid3]

meh i am bi and open about it