|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Part Straight / Part Gay / Part Bi / Part Pan ....
Does that answer your question? :D I agree with Bionca. Labels are bad enough; having to ask yourself what label you might fit out of fear and confusion is even worse. There are few -- if any -- absolutes in life. Just ride with it. A tolerance for ambiguity is the sign of a healthy mind and healthy society. That all reads as far more aggressive than it's meant to. About five years ago, I could NEVER have conceived of getting aroused by anything but a genetic female. Since then? I've dabbled in various areas. I feel a lot better for exploring than not. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
same answer but i love cocks but i see myself as a pansexual but i m unhappy to live my sexually life secretly. thats the most important thing i think. it is not matter u r bi, gay, straight or pan... how u live your life, are u free, what would your parents, friends say, if they learn that
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does it matter? Nah! Give me a TS, Shemale, a G-Girl, or a Pretty Boy.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
i don't find men atractive, generaly, although king leonidis from 300 asked some serious questions of my sexuality. but i think i'm just a freak on a leash a trysexuall to quote ali G, i'll try anything sexual.
"spartans" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Excuse me while I wax a bit lyrical here. I didn't necessarily intend this; it sorta just happened as I went along.
Quote:
![]() Hayden Christensen kinda does it for me. KINDA. Not really, but kinda. Then there's this guy on the net: Marat http://www.fruityboys.net/galleries/...at4/index.html I wouldn't say he's androgynous, but there's a certain feminimity to him which I find appealing. On the other hand, writing about this sorta "weirds" me out. I don't know why. Probably lots and lots of social engineering, which we all endure. However, I just took a look at those photos again, and sure enough, they still turn me on. He's f*cking adorable. That's what I meant with my semi-serious "Part Straight / Part Gay / Part Bi / Part Pan", which was also a play on labeling, not least because I was getting less conventional with each one. Now, having just looked at those pictures, and, as stated, saying they turn me on, I am suddenly not so freaked out. Now I can project ahead to what I'm about to type, and actually type it, without feeling "strange". Now I can say: I'd love to suck his cock. There. Nothing awkward. Or, I'd like to kiss him. Slightly awkward, but dissipating-awkward. Alright, I'm rambling, and maybe hiding behind a bit of satire. But the point here is that we probably all have tastes along a broad spectrum, and sometimes, the right conditions can come along and make us aware of another little patch in that spectrum. I suppose that's axiomatic of life. We have experiences and they provoke us. We may be creatures of pattern and creatures of habit, but we're always changing; 99.9% of these changes go unnoticed, then the feelings are perhaps suppressed, then explored, then embraced. IF we're lucky enough to move that far along the path of emancipation, that is. What I wrote there has just reminded me of a comment by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhaur: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." If any of us are brutally honest and ask about our love of shemales, we'll probably realise we went through those three stages internally, never mind the external paradigm shift that Shchopenhaur seemed to be on about. That's one reason tolerance is so utterly important in this world. People are ambiguous and ambiguity must be tolerated if people are allowed to be free. While we all do great things under oppression and duress, it's that breaking out and grasping for freedom that puts us above every other animal on Earth and will be the key to our survival, if, indeed, we are to survive. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you like the Three Stooges you're straight.
If you don't you're a girl. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use the word "bi" a lot. Even on my public myspace, I'm listed as "not sure" on my orientation, but say I'm somewhat "bi/pansexual/hetero-flexible but heteroromantic".
I love the female body. I also love the bigger bulkier male body. Especially the larger muscular form. But with guys, the cock is the most important part. I do love guys who are big enough to manhandle my little ass, as tops. My main attraction is women. I'm mostly bottom with guys, only going with guys who pack 7 or more inches. I can be either with a shemale but prefer being a bottom. Same size thing applies. With guys, it's a lot rarer that I'm attracted to their facial features and whole package or I'd stop if I seen them on the street (unless they're a bodybuilder or something. lol). But, I'd def top for some dragboys. 100% males who just look cute as little girls. I love shemales as I see the "best of both worlds". The "bi" thing still does feel funny, because I don't see guys on the average in clubs. movies, etc and think "he's cute" like I do with women. Some would call that "straight but kinky". I just use "bi" because it simplifies it. Last edited by ziggybabie; 07-31-2008 at 03:39 PM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
meh i am bi and open about it
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|