|
Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share ![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It does cover the whole grouping of trans-varient people.
Bjt therein lies the problem. Almost every transsexual woman I know (a lot) totally rejects this term as applying to them as it implies (incorrectly) a connection, overlap or similarity with CD's and Tv's. I think the term was coined by persons with no accurate understanding of transsexual people. The general lumping together of transsexual people with other trans-varient people is inaccurate and does not acknowledge that there is little overlap. {Except possibly in an individual ts persons personal history} The use of the term 'Transgender' to include trans-people (of all flavours) is similar to the way that trans-people been lumped together under the LGBT banner, for political convenience. While at the same time not acknowledging that LBG may have no relevance to most T's sexual orientation. I just found this stuff which goes back 40+ years Actually, most ts women I know don't give it any real consideration as they don't identify as Tg or as Ts for that matter either. We identify as women. (That's not everyone; I know two people happy to identify as Ts. So there you go) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Titles | smc | General Discussion | 17 | 12-27-2010 01:45 PM |