GOP'ish candidates

[smc]

It is often brought up in political discourse that those who are most vehemently anti-abortion rights seem to have little interest in ensuring that society cares for the needs of children once they are born. I suggest that Mitt Romney would make a strong exception for this child:

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

It is often brought up in political discourse that those who are most vehemently anti-abortion rights seem to have little interest in ensuring that society cares for the needs of children once they are born. I suggest that Mitt Romney would make a strong exception for this child:

Woah... D?j? vu all over again

[smc]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

Woah... D?j? vu all over again

So, I forgot that I had posted this a couple of weeks again in a different thread. Whoops.

While I have absolutely no doubt that you, TracyCoxx, have never made any mistake at any time anywhere that is even remotely like mine , one wonders whether you can defend the presumptive GOP candidate on this issue.

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

one wonders whether you can defend the presumptive GOP candidate on this issue.

not to try and be dense, but what specific issue are you talking about? Yeah I know it's a knock on big evil corporations, but what about it?

[smc]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

not to try and be dense, but what specific issue are you talking about? Yeah I know it's a knock on big evil corporations, but what about it?

It's about corporations being "people," which is obvious even to you ... as are the implications in our political system.

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

It's about corporations being "people," which is obvious even to you ... as are the implications in our political system.

I think Mitt says it pretty simply:
"Corporations are people my friend... Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes?"

Those earnings go to people. Then they get taxed on those earnings. If you tax the corporation as well, you're taxing those people twice. As for your cartoon... A woman would be far more likely to give birth to a sole proprietorship don't you think?

In Obama's latest ads he's saying he's for insourcing. Yet his policies say otherwise. What corporation looking at this map would want to do business in the USA?

[smc]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

I think Mitt says it pretty simply:
"Corporations are people my friend... Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes?"

Those earnings go to people. Then they get taxed on those earnings. If you tax the corporation as well, you're taxing those people twice. As for your cartoon... A woman would be far more likely to give birth to a sole proprietorship don't you think?

In Obama's latest ads he's saying he's for insourcing. Yet his policies say otherwise. What corporation looking at this map would want to do business in the USA?

I didn't expect you to answer the real question about the "implications in our political system" for defining corporations as people (which gives them the rights people enjoy). Thanks for living up to my expectations.

[tslust]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

What corporation looking at this map would want to do business in the USA?

Wow, to hear the liberals talk, the corporations in America are not taxed at all (in GE's [the company in obama's back pocket] case this would be true). The only country with a coperate rate higher than ours (40%) is United Arab Emirates.