What sort of relationship do you want with a ladyboy? - Your Votes!!!

[StellaDixxie]

the majority that chose casual sex strike me as cowards.

[Guly_French]

Bascally, full-time girlfriend. I chose marriage though, as I want to show that no matter what her past is, the one I will truly and deeply love deserves that I dedicate my life to her, and to us. But also because it is a way for me to point out that it is awfully wrong that marrying a girl is forbidden or allowed based on what hangs (or hangs not) between her legs...

I can understand what Bionca wrote. I'd like to add it's hard for men who just want to have a nice chat to begin with but are not given the chance because they are not HAWT. But I guess that on this as on anything else, things are never a given, you have to go get it.

The other thing is that of course talking about common interests is the key. But let's be honnest, someday, if things get as far as being more than friends, or you picture to go there, you'll have to talk about sex. And trust me, I have seen girls being frigthened to talk about it so much they ran away calling me pervert, though they wanted to try a relationship with me too. (And no, I was no longer 17 at that time).

Sorry for the messed up post, I have a nice headache this morning that prevents me from writing something... better tought out

Oh, and if one of you like to talk about computer sciences, computer networks sciences, fantasy and SF universes or the Cthulhu Mythos, mp me. Got a lot of work but I drop by every morning. I'll definitely answer.

[mabedzaqueen]

Originally Posted by StellaDixxie

the majority that chose casual sex strike me as cowards.

Hi Stella! First, let me explain why ?the majority that chose casual sex? do not strike me as cowards... I believe it takes balls for someone who's been in a LTR (married or not) for a number of years to put it all in jeopardy just to make a dream (or fantasy) come true, knowing from the start how unbearable the outcome may be; Also, i can't see someone ready to risk his health for a few hours of intense pleasure (or a life-changing experience?) as a ?coward?...

Second, if it's not too personal, could you please tell us the reason why they're cowards in your eyes?? For me, well i voted ?not sure? as it is very much how i feel after 19 years of marriage, a divorce, two encounters with money-hungry MILFs (first one Disappointing, second one Disastrous), the 'discovery' that i was not-so-straight-after-all and, for good measure, a rapidly growing taste towards young femboys Now i guess i'll just see what the future brings...
______
Dennis.

[Translover Jonny]

I would go for full time marriage, I have been married before to an "ordinary" girl and now i have tried that and no more! Ladyboys are my passion in life now and i can?t even imagine me going back to "ordinary" girls again. You know once you got a taste of it ;-).
I only date ladyboys now and i definitely hope to find my future wife some day. The problem is that many beautiful ladyboy wants to make the surgery and become full time women as fast as possible, i understand that but the problem for me is to find a sweet and good looking ladyboy that won?t do the surgery and become at post-op ladyboy. The one i would like to marry and spend my life with should stay pre-op, I just love them the way they are.

[svartekaptenen]

Originally Posted by StellaDixxie

the majority that chose casual sex strike me as cowards.

I disagree a marriage is a serious commitment that one should not enter
without giving it serious thought and contemplation.

Originally Posted by svartekaptenen

I disagree a marriage is a serious commitment that one should not enter
without giving it serious thought and contemplation.

Very true. But if we re-ask the question with cis (non trans) women. Would the same people who said only casual sex with trans girls, also say casual sex with cis girls? If the answer is yes, than not a big deal. But if the answer is no, than they are in fact cowards in my opinion.

Originally Posted by ThirdEyeGirl

Very true. But if we re-ask the question with cis (non trans) women. Would the same people who said only casual sex with trans girls, also say casual sex with cis girls? If the answer is yes, than not a big deal. But if the answer is no, than they are in fact cowards in my opinion.

Scintillating point. It would mean that someone fancies t-ladies as fantasies or as pure objects of perversion, but totaly disreagard both their personalities and their feelings as persons.

[ila]

Originally Posted by danthepoetman

Scintillating point. It would mean that someone fancies t-ladies as fantasies or as pure objects of perversion, but totaly disreagard both their personalities and their feelings as persons.

The part that I put in bold (although taken out of context) would applies to more than just those looking for sex with transwomen. A look through online adds will show that regardless of whether people are looking for homo or hetero sex that a common theme is NSA (no strings attached).

Originally Posted by ila

The part that I put in bold (although taken out of context) would applies to more than just those looking for sex with transwomen. A look through online adds will show that regardless of whether people are looking for homo or hetero sex that a common theme is NSA (no strings attached).

And NSA means, in my book, No Satisfaction Allowed. haha
Because emotional pleasure goes hand in hand with physical pleasure for me.

[ila]

Originally Posted by ThirdEyeGirl

And NSA means, in my book, No Satisfaction Allowed. haha
Because emotional pleasure goes hand in hand with physical pleasure for me.

I love your definition of NSA.

Originally Posted by ila

The part that I put in bold (although taken out of context) would applies to more than just those looking for sex with transwomen. A look through online adds will show that regardless of whether people are looking for homo or hetero sex that a common theme is NSA (no strings attached).

Yes indeed, ila, we see that all over personnal ads and pages after pages. We live in a pretty cold world, and the fact that we all meet here on this forum might be either a demonstration of that or an escape from it -i'm not the first "genius" to point that one out... But in this precise case, as expressed by ThirdEyeGirl, it would mean that someone would care for a relationship with a gg, but show total disdain for the feelings of a t-woman in a potential affair, which would seem utterly contemptuous and disgusting. I don't understand how anyone can envision any person like that. They in such case would might as well use a doll or a dildo (or what is it, a "fleshlight" ? is that how it's called ? -anyways...) I'm always puzzled by such demeanor and/or frame of mind...