GOP'ish candidates

[smc]

Originally Posted by smc

ila, you are wasting your time. For TracyCoxx, the truth is never going to get in the way of making a "point." Meanwhile, I am left to wonder why TracyCoxx is allowed to make such a slanderous claim even after it has been refuted

Originally Posted by ila

To clear things up and so there is no ambiguity whatsoever, the site owner and I were the only ones involved in the last bans. No one suggested it, demanded it, or even hinted at it. We did it as forum rules were broken and not for the first time by the affected individuals. Action had to be taken and it was. ...

And TracyCoxx even gets to continue posting despite being an inveterate liar about what I did in my moderator capacity. Go figure ...

[smc]

It is often brought up in political discourse that those who are most vehemently anti-abortion rights seem to have little interest in ensuring that society cares for the needs of children once they are born. I suggest that Mitt Romney would make a strong exception for this child:

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

It is often brought up in political discourse that those who are most vehemently anti-abortion rights seem to have little interest in ensuring that society cares for the needs of children once they are born. I suggest that Mitt Romney would make a strong exception for this child:

Woah... D?j? vu all over again

[smc]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

Woah... D?j? vu all over again

So, I forgot that I had posted this a couple of weeks again in a different thread. Whoops.

While I have absolutely no doubt that you, TracyCoxx, have never made any mistake at any time anywhere that is even remotely like mine , one wonders whether you can defend the presumptive GOP candidate on this issue.

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

one wonders whether you can defend the presumptive GOP candidate on this issue.

not to try and be dense, but what specific issue are you talking about? Yeah I know it's a knock on big evil corporations, but what about it?

[smc]

Originally Posted by TracyCoxx

not to try and be dense, but what specific issue are you talking about? Yeah I know it's a knock on big evil corporations, but what about it?

It's about corporations being "people," which is obvious even to you ... as are the implications in our political system.

[TracyCoxx]

Originally Posted by smc

It's about corporations being "people," which is obvious even to you ... as are the implications in our political system.

I think Mitt says it pretty simply:
"Corporations are people my friend... Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes?"

Those earnings go to people. Then they get taxed on those earnings. If you tax the corporation as well, you're taxing those people twice. As for your cartoon... A woman would be far more likely to give birth to a sole proprietorship don't you think?

In Obama's latest ads he's saying he's for insourcing. Yet his policies say otherwise. What corporation looking at this map would want to do business in the USA?