shemale anal orgasm

[smc]

Originally Posted by sosed

I think we are not understand each other correctly. Transwoman and genetic woman are woman and have female brains, The difference is only, that transwoman are born with male body, which function different than female body and they don't have vagina, but cock. Processes in transwoman and genetic woman brains are the same, but different than in male brain. Every person is unicum and have his/her own desires and wishes. The question is only about anal orgasm, how transwoman feel it, because of this differences, she is born with, but that doesn't make her less feminine than other girls.

I can't speak for your understanding of what I wrote, although I think it was pretty clear. I understood exactly what you wrote. I know you are asking about anal orgasm. But you also wrote this:

"natural female sexual desires are to be penetrated and impregnated"

and I am simply putting forth two things about that statement. Again, the first is that you should not presume that if these are "natural" that the it would be unnatural for a female to have sexual desires to penetrate and even impregnate. I once had a girlfriend who was all female, in every way, and who was obsessed with the thought of penetrating me. She wanted a cock so bad that sometimes during sex it seemed to consume her. She often spoke of a past girlfriend of hers who she wished she could have had a baby with. Would you say that these desires of her, a female, are not natural?

The second is that if we accept as natural that some women are born with cocks, mustn't we also accept as natural that some women who are born with cocks have sexual desires that include penetrating others with their cocks, and perhaps even impregnating them?

This is about your use of the word "natural." You use it in a way that suggests you might have just easily chosen to use "normal" -- and that, I hope, is not a path you want to go down, at least not on this site!

Ask about anal orgasm all you want, but I advise not putting your question in a context that suggests some other sexual desire is unnatural. If that wasn't your intention, it might be a good idea to retract that part of your statement.

[sosed]

I think I get it, what you want to say. It seems it take some time to me. Improper word could change a meaning, which is not meant and I could not see it. If there is a way to change "natural" with "normal", than the meaning could be more correct.

[smc]

Originally Posted by sosed

I think I get it, what you want to say. It seems it take some time to me. Improper word could change a meaning, which is not meant and I could not see it. If there is a way to change "natural" with "normal", than the meaning could be more correct.

NO, you really don't get it. NORMAL would be an even worse word choice than NATURAL -- unless that's what you mean, in which case I think you have a lot of explaining to do to the transwomen that you call "dear" in an earlier post.

[sosed]

Huh, now you find me in this linguistic trap of meanings. It is hard to say which word is proper here. By biology rules of males and females are different and I just want to explain, that processes in female and male brains are different. Every person is unicum and his/her desires are natural and normal. I think this sentence must be deleted, because it could make too much harm, where it is not needed.

[smc]

Originally Posted by sosed

Huh, now you find me in this linguistic trap of meanings. It is hard to say which word is proper here. By biology rules of males and females are different and I just want to explain, that processes in female and male brains are different. Every person is unicum and his/her desires are natural and normal. I think this sentence must be deleted, because it could make too much harm, where it is not needed.

It's really quite simple. Forget the "biology rules" -- those have been subverted by the desire to assign definitiveness to gender roles. Here's what matters for our discussion. Do you want to state that a female who has the sexual desire to penetrate and impregnate is UNNATURAL or ABNORMAL, or do you accept that these desires in a female are as NATURAL and NORMAL as they are in a male? Conversely, do you accept that a male's desire to be penetrated is perfectly NATURAL and NORMAL? I hope so, because I think about being penetrated every single day, and you don't want to be suggesting that I am unnatural or abnormal, now, do you?

[ila]

Originally Posted by smc

It's really quite simple. Forget the "biology rules" -- those have been subverted by the desire to assign definitiveness to gender roles. Here's what matters for our discussion. Do you want to state that a female who has the sexual desire to penetrate and impregnate is UNNATURAL or ABNORMAL, or do you accept that these desires in a female are as NATURAL and NORMAL as they are in a male? Conversely, do you accept that a male's desire to be penetrated is perfectly NATURAL and NORMAL? I hope so, because I think about being penetrated every single day, and you don't want to be suggesting that I am unnatural or abnormal, now, do you?

It's a linguistic trap. Never ask a question with a negative in it as can be interpreted in one of two ways. The originator and receiver will most likely interpret it in opposite ways and hence also misinterpret the answer.

[smc]

Originally Posted by ila

It's a linguistic trap. Never ask a question with a negative in it as can be interpreted in one of two ways. The originator and receiver will most likely interpret it in opposite ways and hence also misinterpret the answer.

What trap? The OP implied by omission that something was unnatural or abnormal, and I take issue with that. He was given ample opportunity to clarify and did not.