Pretty Boys

[smc]

Originally Posted by unseenseer

Here I post some of the pics which I think would strengthen my case at the risk of being labeled as "gay". I love these boys. And they can't be called ladyboys or femboys for that matter. They are just on the borderline of transformation.

Your earlier post and this post are quite confusing. You write that these pics would "strengthen" your "case," and from your initial I would conclude that your "case" is that this once-promising thread couldn't keep it up (I guess "it" is the promise, although the promise is unclear), that most of the pics belong -- according to you -- to other threads, and that you believe there is nothing special about this thread (I draw the latter conclusion from what I assume is a rhetorical question: "What's so special about this thread then?").

It seems you believe you have some insight into what definitively determines whether someone is a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or now, with your newer post, a "ladyboy." I believe that these labels are extremely malleable. The appropriate approach to take is, in my opinion, to be ecumenical with our classifications and, much more important, to accept however an individual identifies. Thus, if the person in your first picture identifies as a woman, then that person is a woman. If the person in your second picture identifies as a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or "boi" or whatever, then I accept it.

Finally, there is a lot of discussion on this site about being "gay." You seem to be concerned about being so labeled. I suggest you do a search and read some of these posts. Why anyone would worry about such a label is beyond me.

[kitty cox]

Originally Posted by smc

Your earlier post and this post are quite confusing. You write that these pics would "strengthen" your "case," and from your initial I would conclude that your "case" is that this once-promising thread couldn't keep it up (I guess "it" is the promise, although the promise is unclear), that most of the pics belong -- according to you -- to other threads, and that you believe there is nothing special about this thread (I draw the latter conclusion from what I assume is a rhetorical question: "What's so special about this thread then?").

It seems you believe you have some insight into what definitively determines whether someone is a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or now, with your newer post, a "ladyboy." I believe that these labels are extremely malleable. The appropriate approach to take is, in my opinion, to be ecumenical with our classifications and, much more important, to accept however an individual identifies. Thus, if the person in your first picture identifies as a woman, then that person is a woman. If the person in your second picture identifies as a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or "boi" or whatever, then I accept it.

Finally, there is a lot of discussion on this site about being "gay." You seem to be concerned about being so labeled. I suggest you do a search and read some of these posts. Why anyone would worry about such a label is beyond me.

I believe SMC has touched upon a subject near and deer to my hart. The young boy that has feminine features and qualities holds that extra intriguing, ingredient that makes them extremely difficult to categorize or pigeonhole. Think about it they could pass as a cute boy or a cute girl they also could get all dolled up and pass for a young woman. They could pass for a very pretty cross dresser, and if they decide to go all the way and become a transsexual then they will make for a very fine looking one.
Yes this individual has all of these worlds open to them so you have to let them identify them selves.all I care about is that they are hot and they have the ability to keep me guessing. Kitty Cox The Itriguing 3rd Sex

[Slavetoebony]

Originally Posted by unseenseer

Here I post some of the pics which I think would strengthen my case at the risk of being labeled as "gay". I love these boys. And they can't be called ladyboys or femboys for that matter. They are just on the borderline of transformation.

Originally Posted by smc

Your earlier post and this post are quite confusing. You write that these pics would "strengthen" your "case," and from your initial I would conclude that your "case" is that this once-promising thread couldn't keep it up (I guess "it" is the promise, although the promise is unclear), that most of the pics belong -- according to you -- to other threads, and that you believe there is nothing special about this thread (I draw the latter conclusion from what I assume is a rhetorical question: "What's so special about this thread then?").

It seems you believe you have some insight into what definitively determines whether someone is a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or now, with your newer post, a "ladyboy." I believe that these labels are extremely malleable. The appropriate approach to take is, in my opinion, to be ecumenical with our classifications and, much more important, to accept however an individual identifies. Thus, if the person in your first picture identifies as a woman, then that person is a woman. If the person in your second picture identifies as a "femboy" or "pretty boy" or "boi" or whatever, then I accept it.

Finally, there is a lot of discussion on this site about being "gay." You seem to be concerned about being so labeled. I suggest you do a search and read some of these posts. Why anyone would worry about such a label is beyond me.

I have been involved before in similar discussions on other 'adult' boards about labeling people with certain sexual urges / desires as "straight", "bi" or "gay". Honestly speaking, I don't give a hoot about how some people might want to label me or others.

The same in here. "Lady Boy", "Pretty Boy" or "Fem Boy", it makes no difference to me. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and consenting adults should be free to do whatever they like. And great to see a bit of variety in here.