Quote:
Originally Posted by georgesoros
i have been with preop tgirls and i treated them with respect, no bad language, no aggression, violence, no nothing. i dont like men = masculine body+face+dick. i like tgirls, and i like that they still have a dick. then i might be classified as gay, bi, and thats ok, it doesnt bother me what the label is. the reason im mentioning this as a pretext is cause i want to get to the point which is, i like tgirls cause they have a dick, that is whats excites me. and i belive most of you here that are overly defending tgirls are simply charlatans trying to pick up some points. if youre not excited by the dick, and tgirls are simply girls, then whats the excitement about? why lurking around on this forum.
|
Thanks to aw9725 for posting above and thus bringing the georgesoros post to my attention. Somehow, I had missed it.
The tendency of people to spout off without listening to carefully, or reading fully, that which they are commenting on is alive and well on this site as much as in the "real" world. georgesoros bemoans that some members here are "overly defending tgirls," which may be the case: I suppose that "overly" is in the eye of the beholder. But he completely misses what the defense is about. No one, as far as I can tell, has done any defending of the sort he implies. Rather, it is about defending the right of tgirls (indeed, of everyone) to have the final say when it comes to personal gender identification. If a particular tgirl says, "I am a woman," who is georgesoros or anyone else to say otherwise? It's not about some asinine "affirmative action" as georgesoros stated in his earlier post.
I am proud to be one of what georgesoros calls "charlatans" if defending a person's self-determination is what makes you one.
Finally, I bet the real George Soros would agree with me.