Best paysites

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by smc

, and that it regards hardcore scenes and the use of English-speaking models, of which
Bob has shot many..

I had no problem with SMC disagreeing with me at first, but now I do because of the reasoning. CLEARLY Bob has not shot a lot of hardcore scenes. His hardcore selection is very small compared to many. When was the last time he released a hardcore scene? I believe it was last year so that is at least 6 months.

His photo work is great. However the site can be so much better if he put focus on hardcore work. That will lure more people to the site.

Originally Posted by Sigma

I disagree about Bob Tgirls. It is mostly photosets. The site has potential to be better if they shoot hardcore scenes.

My comment had NOTHING to do with English speaking models. It had to do with hardcore scene. Don't twist around what I said.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

I had no problem with SMC disagreeing with me at first, but now I do because of the reasoning. CLEARLY Bob has not shot a lot of hardcore scenes. His hardcore selection is very small compared to many. When was the last time he released a hardcore scene? I believe it was last year so that is at least 6 months.

His photo work is great. However the site can be so much better if he put focus on hardcore work. That will lure more people to the site.

I am not disputing your right to an opinion. I am simply pointing out that there are some people who do not judge a site strictly on the basis of how much hardcore there is. Bob deserves kudos for his artful presentation of his models and his exquisite taste -- irrespective of whether the models are in hardcore scenes or other photosets.

Originally Posted by Sigma

My comment had NOTHING to do with English speaking models. It had to do with hardcore scene. Don't twist around what I said.

As for the English-speaking angle, perhaps I have misread your intent in the other thread. Remember, I have not twice in this thread stated that my view of your posts is in the context of the other thread, too. If I am mistaken, I apologize. I did not set out to "twist around" what you said.

[seanchai]

Wow ganging up on SMC, because he corrected a poster, who was wrong?

Bob's site, is not mainly photosets. It's photosets and video which update regularly. In your opinion, it would be better if it was a hardcore site, well obviously, it's not a hardcore site, it is more of a solo site which many many people prefer. Do judge an apple on it's taste, if you were wanting an orange.

If you want a hardcore site, then go to one of them (http://www.shemale-pornstar.com). If you want a site which is mainly solo photos and videos of the best TS's in the industry, then try Bob's site. I think some of you need more than 30 posts before questioning a moderator and being so rude.

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by seanchai

Wow ganging up on SMC, because he corrected a poster, who was wrong?

Bob's site, is not mainly photosets. It's photosets and video which update regularly. In your opinion, it would be better if it was a hardcore site, well obviously, it's not a hardcore site, it is more of a solo site which many many people prefer. Do judge an apple on it's taste, if you were wanting an orange.

If you want a hardcore site, then go to one of them (http://www.shemale-pornstar.com). If you want a site which is mainly solo photos and videos of the best TS's in the industry, then try Bob's site. I think some of you need more than 30 posts before questioning a moderator and being so rude.

How are we rude? Aren't you being rude for telling someone their opinion was corrected?

Wrong?

I am not wrong nor correct. It is an OPINION. Learn some English Seanchai because I told you at Hungdevils to do that.

We all have different standards. People will NOT judge something the same way. His site is overall bad by my standards. Does that matter to Bob? Nope.

I do think that Shemale Pornstar is a good site. Last Week was the first bad week in a while because the same girl had both of the updates that week and she is not up to my standards for a transsexual woman. Vanity did shoot for the site twice. NO hardcore with Vanity with both updates? That's disappointing. However overall it is still a good site. I actually enjoy Jezebel's scenes on the site. Tara's scene as a schoolgirl is really hot. The site has mostly what I am looking for in a transsexual woman slender, big boobs, sexy and passable. I will recommend the site to everyone who is looking for sexy busty passable girls.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

How are we rude? Aren't you being rude for telling someone their opinion was corrected?

Wrong?

I am not wrong nor correct. It is an OPINION. Learn some English Seanchai because I told you at Hungdevils to do that.

We all have different standards. People will NOT judge something the same way. His site is overall bad by my standards. Does that matter to Bob? Nope.

I do think that Shemale Pornstar is a good site. Last Week was the first bad week in a while because the same girl had both of the updates that week and she is not up to my standards for a transsexual woman. Vanity did shoot for the site twice. NO hardcore with Vanity with both updates? That's disappointing. However overall it is still a good site. I actually enjoy Jezebel's scenes on the site. Tara's scene as a schoolgirl is really hot. The site has mostly what I am looking for in a transsexual woman slender, big boobs, sexy and passable. I will recommend the site to everyone who is looking for sexy busty passable girls.

We do not allow personal attacks on this site. Challenging one's opinion is one thing. Suggesting that someone has to be told again to learn English, because that person was told at another site, is another. By the way, seanchai's English is fine.

The issue here really is, in my view, that Sigma has a particularly narrow view of what constitutes acceptability in a TS porn site. That is perfectly reasonable. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. When one states one's opinion openly, though, one must do so with the understanding that others have the right to agree or disagree, and say so. I disagreed, and said so clumsily. I corrected myself.

I believe that Sigma imposes his measure of acceptability in a way that negates the validity of another point of view. He then makes broad generalizations as conclusory remarks based on that imposition and negation. This is explicit or implicit in several of his posts. By saying that, I am not attacking Sigma personally, but analyzing his communication. I do this when I teach my PhD students, and I reserve the right to do it now since it is part of my right to state my opinion.

As for the use of the word "passable." I find this term to be reprehensible. I realize that many use it to describe themselves, but I think it is disrespectful to someone's gender identity to use it the way Sigma does. I wish the word would disappear from the TS vocabulary. Some may be more or less along the transition path. I saw a 2-year-old baby the other day and thought it was a girl. It is a boy. Should I have said to the mother, in addition to telling her how cute her baby was, that he is not "passable"?

[crsd1970]

Look SMC, Its all pretty simple to understand. To go around CORRECTING people on their opinions is a holier-than-thou attitude, and you shouldn't be surprised that people don't appreciate that. You wanna agree or disagree with someone, fine, but don't go around correcting others as if you are some sort of Headmaster. And as far as I'm concerned, I'm done with this discussion.

[smc]

Originally Posted by crsd1970

Look SMC, Its all pretty simple to understand. To go around CORRECTING people on their opinions is a holier-than-thou attitude, and you shouldn't be surprised that people don't appreciate that. You wanna agree or disagree with someone, fine, but don't go around correcting others as if you are some sort of Headmaster. And as far as I'm concerned, I'm done with this discussion.

Before you go around casting aspersions, you should read the full exchange. I explained the mistake of how my first note came across. Perhaps you have never miscommunicated. If so, i commend you. Give credit for someone acknowledging and apologizing.

I susbsequently did NOT correct others, but expressed my own opinion and my opinion of the opinion of others.

You are more than welcome to say what you want. But the fact that you characterize my action as "X" when it is "Y" doesn't make it "X."