Best paysites

[guiltydreamer]

Bit pedantic smc.... Sigma did commence by stating disagreement regarding the site to which you refer.

[smc]

Originally Posted by guiltydreamer

Bit pedantic smc.... Sigma did commence by stating disagreement regarding the site to which you refer.

Perhaps so, guiltydreamer. In my "defense," I would say that my post was made in the context of Sigma's recent thread and Sigma's posts therein, which I find to be relevant to his statement about Bob's Tgirls:

http://forum.transladyboy.com/showthread.php?t=6618

[merelypink]

shemale yum is my favorite

[thaiboys]

It'so curious.... I found so many people in the web pleased to watch Tbob, but... don't you think that the ladyboys are like transzilla??

I really love the site that I subscribe because trannies are really beatiful.

[crsd1970]

Originally Posted by smc

Perhaps so, guiltydreamer. In my "defense," I would say that my post was made in the context of Sigma's recent thread and Sigma's posts therein, which I find to be relevant to his statement about Bob's Tgirls:

http://forum.transladyboy.com/showthread.php?t=6618

Yup, I'm afraid it is definitely pedantic. Since the original post says 'I disagree about Bob Tgirls', its an opinion. Why SMC has the desire or interest to refute other peoples opinions ( which are just as valid as yours, riiiiight ?) sounds a bit suspect.

[smc]

Originally Posted by crsd1970

Yup, I'm afraid it is definitely pedantic. Since the original post says 'I disagree about Bob Tgirls', its an opinion. Why SMC has the desire or interest to refute other peoples opinions ( which are just as valid as yours, riiiiight ?) sounds a bit suspect.

crsd1970, if you have some suspicion ("sounds a bit suspect"), why don't you articulate it either here or in a PM to me?

I will restate my original point and what I subsequently called my "defense" to be more clear. I believe without equivocation that all are entitled to their opinions. The opinion stated about Bob's site is completely valid. I erred by allowing my view that there is a subtext to the opinion, which I believe is validated by the OP's statements in another thread, to cloud the way in which I made my point. For that, I take full responsibility and apologize for suggesting that the holding of an opinion is more valid for any one person. I do not rescind my view that there is a subtext, and that it regards hardcore scenes and the use of English-speaking models, of which
Bob has shot many.

It is unfortunate that the thread has taken this turn, and when this matter is resolved I will do my part to help it return to its original purpose.

[Sigma]

Originally Posted by smc

, and that it regards hardcore scenes and the use of English-speaking models, of which
Bob has shot many..

I had no problem with SMC disagreeing with me at first, but now I do because of the reasoning. CLEARLY Bob has not shot a lot of hardcore scenes. His hardcore selection is very small compared to many. When was the last time he released a hardcore scene? I believe it was last year so that is at least 6 months.

His photo work is great. However the site can be so much better if he put focus on hardcore work. That will lure more people to the site.

Originally Posted by Sigma

I disagree about Bob Tgirls. It is mostly photosets. The site has potential to be better if they shoot hardcore scenes.

My comment had NOTHING to do with English speaking models. It had to do with hardcore scene. Don't twist around what I said.

[smc]

Originally Posted by Sigma

I had no problem with SMC disagreeing with me at first, but now I do because of the reasoning. CLEARLY Bob has not shot a lot of hardcore scenes. His hardcore selection is very small compared to many. When was the last time he released a hardcore scene? I believe it was last year so that is at least 6 months.

His photo work is great. However the site can be so much better if he put focus on hardcore work. That will lure more people to the site.

I am not disputing your right to an opinion. I am simply pointing out that there are some people who do not judge a site strictly on the basis of how much hardcore there is. Bob deserves kudos for his artful presentation of his models and his exquisite taste -- irrespective of whether the models are in hardcore scenes or other photosets.

Originally Posted by Sigma

My comment had NOTHING to do with English speaking models. It had to do with hardcore scene. Don't twist around what I said.

As for the English-speaking angle, perhaps I have misread your intent in the other thread. Remember, I have not twice in this thread stated that my view of your posts is in the context of the other thread, too. If I am mistaken, I apologize. I did not set out to "twist around" what you said.

[seanchai]

Wow ganging up on SMC, because he corrected a poster, who was wrong?

Bob's site, is not mainly photosets. It's photosets and video which update regularly. In your opinion, it would be better if it was a hardcore site, well obviously, it's not a hardcore site, it is more of a solo site which many many people prefer. Do judge an apple on it's taste, if you were wanting an orange.

If you want a hardcore site, then go to one of them (http://www.shemale-pornstar.com). If you want a site which is mainly solo photos and videos of the best TS's in the industry, then try Bob's site. I think some of you need more than 30 posts before questioning a moderator and being so rude.

[guiltydreamer]

Originally Posted by crsd1970

Yup, I'm afraid it is definitely pedantic. Since the original post says 'I disagree about Bob Tgirls', its an opinion. Why SMC has the desire or interest to refute other peoples opinions ( which are just as valid as yours, riiiiight ?) sounds a bit suspect.

smc seems to be getting very heavy handed in his "moderator" role in many recent post responses....sounding somewhat tired and emotional.
Perhaps it's time for some rest.