Ask Jenae for real answers - no games.

[randolph]

Originally Posted by randolph

This sounds like Lamarck and Lysenko beliefs in the inheritance of acquired characteristics. No scientific research supports this idea.

I may have to take back that statement. A new study called epigenetics reveals that inheritance is not limited to our genes. Studies have shown that effects of exposure to pesticides and other chemicals, such as cancer can be transmitted to future generations. This is very disturbing evidence suggesting that we must be very careful to preserve and protect our epigenome from damage.

[Jenae LaTorque]

In referance to epigenetics

Like A. Pope said, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing..." I get so disgusted with the silly analogies that the God-believers and the Intelligent Design advocates come up with. I recently saw some folksy looking guy explaining on YouTube that since life doesn't spontaneously appear in a jar of peanut butter in a matter of days; then it couldn't have arisen on Earth without a Creator.

I tell you what I would like to see. A nationally televised confrontation between the evolutionists and the Intelligent Designer people. First each side would be allowed to make their case. Then each side would be allowed to refute the other's case. Then both sides would be given lie detector tests on selected questions and then finally each side would be given IQ tests. Now, how do you think that would turn out?

[randolph]

Originally Posted by Jenae LaTorque

Like A. Pope said, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing..." I get so disgusted with the silly analogies that the God-believers and the Intelligent Design advocates come up with. I recently saw some folksy looking guy explaining on YouTube that since life doesn't spontaneously appear in a jar of peanut butter in a matter of days; then it couldn't have arisen on Earth without a Creator.

I tell you what I would like to see. A nationally televised confrontation between the evolutionists and the Intelligent Designer people. First each side would be allowed to make their case. Then each side would be allowed to refute the other's case. Then both sides would be given lie detector tests on selected questions and then finally each side would be given IQ tests. Now, how do you think that would turn out?

I don't think this would work, why? Some of the ID people may be intelligent but they are not capable of being reasonable. They are like the OJ Simpson jury. That jury would have let him off even if they had stood there and watched him do it. Its like the Baptist church sign. they are hopelessly locked in to an irrational paradigm.

[Jenae LaTorque]

OMG lol !! Did the church members acrually put that up there or is it some kind of prank?

[johndowe]

Hi there.

Prank or not, in their view god gave made us as we are including reason...


JohnDowe.

[Jenae LaTorque]

Originally Posted by johndowe

Hi there.

Prank or not, in their view god gave made us as we are including reason...


JohnDowe.

So that there is no misunderstanding here; my OMG was a joke. As far as I am concerned, the whole idea of God is a joke. I could see that someone put that up there as a statement on the reality that reason is the enemy of faith when it comes to religion. If the church people put that up there as a statement that sums up their position, then it is definately a concession that they realize that: although their belief is unreasonable, they are going to stick with them cuz they can't face the fact that they are mortal and the end of it is just that: their personal ending.

Am I an atheist?

Nope, I am a normal, intelligent person who has weighed the evidence and found it overwheming lacking. So, I refuse to be the one who assumes a label. The THEISTS are the ones who need a label as they are the ones who believe in imaginary friends. They are the ones who refuse to put away their childish beliefs and face the world as it is.

GOD = Goofy Old Dogma

[latexblaze]

Hi Jen, My first ever dose of she-male eye-candy at sweet 16 was delivered via "Shemale Sulka" magazine needless tew say, Sulka & her take on fetish fashion , really caught my eye I'm sooo wanting update my "Sulka Fetish" any info on her baby ? Sabrina ^S^

[Jenae LaTorque]

Sorry, but no. Her heyday was somewhat before my time and she was too extreme for me. Baby Brooke and Suzanne were more my cup of tea.

[Vanillas]

How can someone with an IQ above 150, or above 65 for that matter, choose to live in Wyoming?

[Rachel]

With all the porn that is on this site why are the bananas censored? lol

[Jenae LaTorque]

Originally Posted by Vanillas

How can someone with an IQ above 150, or above 65 for that matter, choose to live in Wyoming?

I suppose it depends on what you value, now don't it? We don't miss the high crime rate and pollution you have elsewhere. But mostly it's the wide open spaces. Because of them we don't have to breathe each other's farts like you all do.