|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share ![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"It is not yet known when or even if Tam will return to play." Up to a 48 games suspension is nothing compared to Tam potentially never playing hockey again. How excessive a 'punishment' is that for Tam just for being a victim of a cowardly assault? Perhaps Cormier's suspension should have been for twice the length of time Tam was kept out of the game by his injuries. ![]() The attitude of the Huskies fans to applaud the decision to appeal the suspension is bad for the reputation of hockey. A bunch of f g a holes.Since Cormier will remain suspended during the appeal process, maybe the QMJHL can make his appeal last for at least a couple of years. ![]() Quote:
Players get away with violence inside the game too often.![]() Clampdown on violence in Rugby Union Recently an independent judicial officer handed David Attoub (of Stade Francais, a French Rugby Union Club) a 70-week ban for eye gouging in a Heikeken Cup defeat by Ulster. The ban means Attoub will not be available to play again until April 22, 2011. His team-mate Julien Dupuy was handed a 24-week ban, reduced to 23 on appeal, for his role in the incident. Attoub's 70-week suspension is the second heaviest eye gouging ban ever handed out. And falls in line with an increasingly tough stance against gouging within Rugby Union, following the outrage over the 8-week ban handed to South Africa flanker Schalk Burger for his gouging of British and Irish Lions wing Luke Fitzgerald during 2009's second Test in Pretoria. As expected Attoub has made an appeal against this ban. The independent judicial officer who imposed the suspension, described it as "the worst act of contact with the eyes I have had to deal with". |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|