[ila]

Originally Posted by sesame

If a radical group has to make a point aggressively against a Govt.,
how should they do it? Protest peacefully until the end of time?
In all ages, in every country, there has been uprising and conflict.
This is the nature of politics.
So people will always come down to a fight if their pleas are ignored.
First petition, then demonstration, then battle. Everyone is not Gandhi.

So when the conflict is unavoidable, whom should the radicals target?
In my opinion, they should fight against the politicians (who are the
actual decision makers) or the military forces. The military are trained
to fight, their very purpose is to protect the state. They are the actual
strength of a state. They keep the borderline safe.

Fighting against the military is much more justified than mutilating
the unarmed civilians indiscriminately!

So you do condone terrorist activities.