[smc]

Originally Posted by MercedesSLR

I formed a opinion based upon your statement which lead me to justify why I should not partake in the activity. Your initial response holds weight in the conversation for the fact that you give the word "worth" a monetary value. On the other hand the context of it indicated that it was ment to represent "fun". Your second statement holds valid in the sense that it would be different to participate in sexual acts with a transgendered person. The reasons for this are many. Your third statement is valid as well however it is asked in the context of an opinion from peers. Based on prior knowledge I have received, the anticipation of performing the act creates a want. However, during the act itself some people have had instant feel of guilt or shame while others have claimed to have experienced this afterwards. So this part of my statement is reflected towards people who have preformed any sexual act with a transgendered person. Did you have any form of guilt or resentment either during or after partaking in sex? My final statement of how you convinced me is quite easy to understand. You claim I have objectified transgendered women to a greater than a simple pornographic posting. The intention of the posting was to obtain feedback. However you make the case that I have viewed a person as an object rather than a human being thus leading me to refuse the offer of consummating because to do so would mean I accknowledge that the transgendered person is now an object of use. To conclude I have simply stated my argument and the way in which you interpret it is up to you. All I can say is I wish you the best in your future endeavors.

I appreciate the clarification. Surely you can see how absent the explanation your earlier statement that my words compelled you to change your mind would appear rather (to be charitable) capricious.