[smc]

Originally Posted by GRH

There WAS a difference between the two speeches SMC. One of them dealt with a credible threat to our national security; the other, not so much. I don't think that was supposed to be what I took away from Fran's post though.

I agree. In fact, I was going to point out that difference, GRH, but I decided to focus on the method of discourse employed in the post, and make a point that cannot be disputed with fabrications. Those who contend that Iraq represented "a credible threat to our national security" will spin all manner of fabrication to make their case. But they cannot deny that the portrait of Obama franalexes seeks to paint with her post is completely false; they can only ignore the truth and keep making the same claim, hoping that if it is said enough times the ignorant will buy it as the truth.