Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
Translation of your translations: I'm going to read things in a manner where I see only what I want to see, rather than what TracyCoxx really wrote. That way, I can argue whichever point I want, regardless of anything, put words in the mouths of others, and try to get away with shifting the focus.
Let's cut the crap. Do you really think anyone believes you're accurately paraphrasing my position? Do you really believe they haven't noticed that you're dodging the discussion again .
We're off topic and back on to familiar whining territory. Let me know when you're ready to discuss things reasonably.
And now for your predictable response complaining of dodging, sophistry etc to which I'll say seriously... Back on topic.
|
Yes, back on topic. Go back to what I wrote about the subjectivity of determining the "constitutionality" of something and respond to it. Otherwise, quit your bullshitting and admit that you changed the subject, not me.