View Single Post
  #54  
Old 12-21-2010
Be_my_nude's Avatar
Be_my_nude Be_my_nude is offline
Senior Ladyboy Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Dales, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 145
Be_my_nude is a glorious beacon of lightBe_my_nude is a glorious beacon of lightBe_my_nude is a glorious beacon of lightBe_my_nude is a glorious beacon of lightBe_my_nude is a glorious beacon of light
Default Bottoms up, girls ! !

Quote:
Originally Posted by mabedzaqueen View Post
Glad you mentioned the key-word PORN in your post, 'cause you never know how far it's gonna take you... Hell, it can turn a typical, married-with-children guy in his early 40s into an all-out femboy-obsessed wanker in a matter of months... Sure, things get worse when said guy ALSO loses desire not only in his wife's pussy, but in every other female-born person, again in a few months' span.

No, I don't think porn is to be taken lightly, especially when it gets you aware that persons like the one in your pic #2 are "for real"... And what if our "typical" guy happens to be more curious than average?? What if he discovers he has "voyeuristic" tendencies he didn't even know about?? How could his female-born wife ever compete with images of cute young twinks just a few notches below femboy-status??

Thereby, it appears that for me, the TEST (as suggested in your 1st post) is more between these 2 groups:

A = persons who were born with a cock, got rid of all unsightly hair, took hormones and undergo multiple surgeries in order to make them look more feminine (when and if possible) than 80% (or so) of the female-born persons, except for one notable thing: they have chosen to KEEP the aforementioned cock; (often vulgarly referred to as shemales)

B = persons also born with a cock, shave all unsightly hair, avoid any workouts that could make their bodies look like the Jason Statham's or Daniel Craig's of the world and instead take advantage of this precious, youthful flesh that nature has given them in order to draw a "different kind of attention" to themselves; (often not so vulgarly referred to as twinks or simply "pretty boys").

As both groups turn me on, joedirty, you'll understand it's difficult for me to pick a winner here...
I liked mabedzaqueen's post. It summed up so completely what Porn apparently does for fellers. It gels too with my own limited experience gained by association and proxy. I feel that the deck is pretty heavily-stacked in this thread insofar as perhaps as many as 90% of this forum's members wouldn't be members unless they were obsessively-preoccupied with M2f Transgenders, either visually, in fantasy, or in practice.

Other members, like myself, may have other reasons. I'd like to see more of the gg's ( I do so LOVE that term ! ) face and figure. I can't say Sasha's genitals are a great turn-on for me, but then I'm such a creature of mood, and I have been sexually attracted in the past to less-than-beautiful individuals, both m & f.

Fellers seem to have such a hunger for the visual stimulus. Coupled with an apparently unlimited supply of Testosterone, Porn Sites flourish as a result.
My own tastes in Porn ? What's here ( some, anyway ), of course, and some of the less-lurid erotic fiction, where tenderness and love seem to count for something.

Great idea for a Thread though. Keep it rolling !!
__________________
Bella

Last edited by dauls; 09-05-2013 at 02:25 PM.
Reply With Quote