View Single Post
  #30  
Old 11-29-2010
smc's Avatar
smc smc is offline
Senior Ladyboy Lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Boston area, U.S.A.
Posts: 18,084
smc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond reputesmc has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to smc
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
Once again you completely avoided the subject at hand. I'm done with talking to you. You can't even debate. All you do is trying to demand how I criticize people.

Quality is based on the CONSUMERS' expectations. Not every consumer has the same expectations of a product. That is SUBJECTIVE.
My response was reasonable. The subject is quality and that's what I wrote about. A significant part of any discourse is about ensuring that both sides understand terminology the same way and correctly. You don't like that I do that, so you falsely turn it into: "All you do is trying to demand how I criticize people."

Nevertheless, product quality has to do with the features and characteristics of a product that contribute to its ability to meed given requirements. Many of those requirements are subjective, and can only be measured by the individual. For instance, as ridiculous as it may seem, one might argue that red hair is a requirement on a pornstar and that a pornstar with brown hair, consequently, does not meet a quality standard. Again, it's a ridiculous use of the word "quality" but it is not incorrect, technically. However, some of those requirements are NOT subjective. In a car, the ability to meet standardized measures of braking ability or fuel economy, etc., are not subjective (the creation of the standard may be, but the meeting of it as a measure of quality is objective). That's all I said.