Quote:
Originally Posted by smc
The problem with four divisions is that without an equitable structure based NOT on geography it would only ensure that yet another team that wouldn't ever make the playoffs under the old system gets in.
It's a definite conundrum.
|
The weak postseason team problem already exists with the three division system - in recent years how many teams just scraping a .500 season have qualified for the postseason?
A few years ago San Diego won the NL West with an 82-80 record - you need a much better record than that to win the wildcard spot.
I like the wildcard,
remember the wildcard Marlins beat the damn Yankees in 2003.
And in 2004... (I'll let smc tell the story)
The choice is a tough one between two divisions (old-school), three divisions (works more naturally) or four divisions (potentially lets more weak teams into postseason).
Controversial, but how about two divisions and two wildcard teams?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smc
As for eliminating some teams, other that the obvious -- Pittsburgh -- who would you eliminate?
|
What is wrong with poor old Pittsburgh?
Apart from Philadelphia (Veterans Stadium) the Pittsburgh is the only other city where I've seen a baseball game - Pirates beat the Expos 6-1, at Three Rivers Stadium - meaning that the two stadia I've seen baseball in have both been demolished!!!
Eliminate:
The Nationals - but that's part of the
"bring back the Expos campaign".