Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma
How are we rude? Aren't you being rude for telling someone their opinion was corrected?
Wrong?
I am not wrong nor correct. It is an OPINION. Learn some English Seanchai because I told you at Hungdevils to do that.
We all have different standards. People will NOT judge something the same way. His site is overall bad by my standards. Does that matter to Bob? Nope.
I do think that Shemale Pornstar is a good site. Last Week was the first bad week in a while because the same girl had both of the updates that week and she is not up to my standards for a transsexual woman. Vanity did shoot for the site twice. NO hardcore with Vanity with both updates? That's disappointing. However overall it is still a good site. I actually enjoy Jezebel's scenes on the site. Tara's scene as a schoolgirl is really hot. The site has mostly what I am looking for in a transsexual woman slender, big boobs, sexy and passable. I will recommend the site to everyone who is looking for sexy busty passable girls.
|
We do not allow personal attacks on this site. Challenging one's opinion is one thing. Suggesting that someone has to be told again to learn English, because that person was told at another site, is another. By the way, seanchai's English is fine.
The issue here really is, in my view, that Sigma has a particularly narrow view of what constitutes acceptability in a TS porn site. That is perfectly reasonable. Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. When one states one's opinion openly, though, one must do so with the understanding that others have the right to agree or disagree, and say so. I disagreed, and said so clumsily. I corrected myself.
I believe that Sigma imposes his measure of acceptability in a way that negates the validity of another point of view. He then makes broad generalizations as conclusory remarks based on that imposition and negation. This is explicit or implicit in several of his posts. By saying that, I am not attacking Sigma personally, but analyzing his communication. I do this when I teach my PhD students, and I reserve the right to do it now since it is part of my right to state my opinion.
As for the use of the word "passable." I find this term to be reprehensible. I realize that many use it to describe themselves, but I think it is disrespectful to someone's gender identity to use it the way Sigma does. I wish the word would disappear from the TS vocabulary. Some may be more or less along the transition path. I saw a 2-year-old baby the other day and thought it was a girl. It is a boy. Should I have said to the mother, in addition to telling her how cute her baby was, that he is not "passable"?