Quote:
Originally Posted by aw9725
Not that anyone here needs defending, but the term “Conse Pubs” clearly was intended to be dismissive of conservative views. It is not generally accepted like the abbreviation “RBI.” Nor is it neutral. I can, for example, find much to fault within the current Republican party, but I support one’s right to post their views without being subjected to demeaning and stereotypical “labels.” We reject stereotypes and labeling as a community--why tolerate it here?
|
AW9725:
Firstly, the only 2 who come here consistently (Angry & Tracy) to represent the views of your youth are conservative libertarians, have identified themselves as such, and are no longer referred to in that manner, as it would be incorrect.
It is nice of you to decide for me what I mean when I say something, like SMC who has consistently told me things about myself I didn't know. Do both of you know someone who hates me still? There is the spoken and the unspoken; there is the public and the PM.
I said it was made-up by me elsewhere in a defensive position, and you say it is deliberate and a fact.
1. My major infraction is an abrev. that I've explained.
2. The two posters I referred to that way are conservative libertarians.
3. I last referred to someone that way over a week ago (post #53 on this thread).
4. If I say it's one thing, then you dispute that strongly, what are you saying? My reason isn't possible or is a flat-out lie? Or is it something else? And you know this how?
What is your thinking on how I should be dealt with?
TAL
SMC:
You used the word again, but where was the before?
You said the abbrev. was a deliberate aggressive action: offensive in nature.
Then, I proved that point by saying it was defensive?
TAL