Quote:
Originally Posted by Talvenada
TRACY:
You cannot think of ONE thing Bush 43 did? I have 118 questionable acts, and 30 impeachable ones?
Torture is a war crime when committed in WWII, and waterboarding was the crime. Starting a war deliberately. Bush 43 broke the FISA law with wiretapping, and this NASA thing is OUTRAGEOUS?
|
I'm not going to loose any sleep over some foreign terrorist being waterboarded. And I've already talked about bush starting the Iraqi war. How did Bush break the FISA law? The wiretapping was discontinued January 2007 and the FISA law went into effect in June 2008?
Not just the Nasa thing, but BO's entire time in office is outrageous. But the Nasa thing is certainly more of a concern than lying about a blowjob.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talvenada
If you can impeach and convict Clinton & Obama, but not Bush 43 you are blinded by party loyalty and ideology. Are you also for a coup to throw out leaders you disagree with?
|
Pay attention. I never said Clinton
should have been impeached. I wrote this a week ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
You can't take down the president over a blowjob. This wasn't about Clinton lying under oath. It was the republicans trying to tarnish Clinton for policies they didn't like. So rather than attacking Clinton's policies they go for the cheap shot of impeaching him for lying about a blowjob. I think they knew they weren't going to actually get him out of office over this, so the whole thing was a useless distraction when the country had more important things to worry about. The best way to handle it wasn't out in the open. It should have been taken care of maturely and out of the public eye. Clinton knew he was caught, the republicans knew they had this over him. Meet in private and reach a deal and let it blow over.
|
Now tell me about being blinded by party ideology again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talvenada
If everyone had a narrow view like yours, we would be better off with a one-party system.
|
Can you elaborate about my narrow view? I stick up for some things Bush does, but not all. I stick up for Clinton, and constantly bash BO. But you just see it as me blindly supporting republicans and trashing democrats. Who has the narrow view?