Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
There's no argument, the right-media is letting BO have it. But at the same time, BO does things that should prompt an objective journalist to ask probing follow up questions and the left-media just lets it go. Also, the administration wants to (sometimes demands to) preview questions whenever possible. That's not how it's supposed to work.
[/url]
|
These are ideological selections, and the MSM doesn't condemn Obama for not governing like Bush or a conservative, which is what the right does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
That's that free market thing.
[/url]
|
That free-market thing happened when they deregulated, and they got 1929 again. If there were no rules & regulations, greed would reign supreme. It's happened twice, and today gaming the system makes it even more necessary. Greed needs to be policed to the point of protecting those who can get screwed even if they do everything right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
Polls show that the american people are against health care and out of control government spending. There is no one in congress with voting power to represent these people who are the majority. So republicans use the only tool they have which is to slow down or stop legislation.
[/url]
|
If it was only health care, it would look legit, but it's only yes on Bush's policies continued.
My point was that it has been made clear, that even if you give them everything they want, they'll vote no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
huh?
below what?
[/url]
|
Not prosecuting war crimes above (covered by) the legalized torture of John Yoo, and below (not covered by) is very quiet.
Waterboarding has been considered a war crime for years, except to Bush-Cheney.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyCoxx
From what I've seen there are multitudes of gripes attributed to Bush, when what's really going on isn't so black and white. And also things like Abu Ghraib being blamed on Bush when it was actually service men & women who committed those acts on their own.
[/url]
|
I use my own list, and Obama is on track for 64, compared to 118 for Bush. If half prove to be true, that would make 59 for Bush.
The Bush ones are a combo of Bush & Cheney, and there are none for Biden, yet.
TRACY:
My view of a questionable action is one where a poor selection was made. If a better choice was available at the time, it was a bad selection. If it turns out to be the best of bad choices, then it was a good selection.
These are not ideological-based actions, and do not favor either side. It does include actions that are or have a good chance of being known by the pres. or VP, and could have been stopped.
Of Bush's 118, some have proven on target; some are still open; but none have been validated, yet.
TAL