Quote:
Originally Posted by smc
Hey, dauls, thanks for your post. I've actually played cricket...
An important point about "slowness": a large part of cricket's slowness is actually "duration." Breaks for lunch, tea, drinks ... those all make the game take longer. No one was slowing the match while waiting for some TV ad to be completed.
|
Funny to hear you've played cricket, that's not something I hear too many Americans saying they've done.
TV imposing on the game is one thing that appears to be different in England compared with North America. Over here TV doesn't dictate the play of the game and in cricket the TV company has to sneak advert breaks in at the change of ends between the overs bowled or during mid-session drinks breaks.
In North America play seems to stop when TV needs it to and won't restart until the ad break has finished.
Quite often a hurried return to the cricket happens just after the ball has been bowled, but then there is plenty of time before the next ball to show a replay of the delivery you just missed.
The 3rd Test Match has just finished and England have clung on for the draw again. We were down to our last wicket for the final 17 balls.
This draw happened in almost an identical manner to the 1st Test where England's last wicket survived for the final 19 balls.
The South Africans must be gutted that they have drawn two matches that they were only one wicket (out) away from winning the game.
So that leaves England 1-0 up in the Series with only one Test Match to go. So England can't lose the Series now, but a Series win away in South Africa will be a fantastic achievement for England.