Quote:
Originally Posted by tgsexual
It's true that many assume we are gay, but it's a label that doesn't fit very well with most of us, because, as you say, most of us aren't attracted to guyish looking guys, which would seem to be the most obvious feature of the gay stereotype.
It's one reason we ought to have a term for ourselves and begin an education of what we are.
I'm not saying that what attracts us ought to be any more palatable than what motivates gays, just that we are different to what is perceived as gays. I wouldn't want to be called straight or lesbian either, because those labels also don't fit.
As for outing people, I think it's a terrible act. Our sexual preferences and activities should be our own private business, to share only with those we choose to.
|
im with ya , maybe im optimistic but it would not surprise me if within the near feature like bout 10 years transsexualism/translovers will be established and accepted by the maintstream as a own well known category aside gay/les