After both Jodie's and Racquel's interventions, it seems like there is almost nothing more to say on the subject, at least on the serious mode. Ladies, you both posted some of the most informative texts that I've ever read on this. Thanks a lot.
As far as I'm concerned, I really love that tiny bit more of femininity that the absence or reduction of the testicules brings to the look. And as someone said in a post, it does make the penis look cuter... Moreover, it is one more testimony to the incredible dedication of transsexual women to achieve their goal, a dedication which personally I never cease to admire. It's not just the beautifull look of a ts that seems so appealing to me, but also this irreducible desire for feminity. Takes a lot of intelligence, ressources and personallity, not to say anything of the efforts in themselves. I admit that's one thing that really gets my drive going. Hope i don't seem to weird for that...

testicles and scrotum removal
 

As for me - I wish to be castrated with removal of testicles and scrotum. I wish my place between my clitty cock and asspussy looks flat, smooth and looks like it never exists there anything except tight smooth and flat skin...

Did your sack shrink? When did you have the operation? I dont know why, but you describing your once 7 to now 5 1/2 without testicles just turned me on.

I'd love to play with a castrated shemale.
 

I think it would be such a turn-on to fondle, caress and suck on an empty sac on a beautiful shemale.:turnon:

I would like to see one in person!

Jewelry?
 

Have any of the wonderful ladies who have had their balls removed had them made into earrings?

If not, what did you do with them after they were removed?

Just sick.

Yes we do still cum. But with the testicles removed, NO liquid comes out.

Mine have been gone for many years and it has helped me in multiple ways. But it is NOT for everyone.

I don't know when it'll happen, but I am excitedly looking forward to having my unwanted "family jewels" removed, someday.

Oh my......on the contrary. To me Dan, what you said above makes you more attractive........not less (or weird, as you put it). :respect: :hug:

Suddenly I noticed that some girls have really pale skin. Like Mandy, Sarina, Ana, Hime and some more I can't remember :frown:
Can those two things- skin pigmentation and hormone level be somehow related?

Thank you kindly, lady Alana. :rolleyes: You don't see it, but I'm blushing... :hug:

Women in general tend to have paler skin than men. I suppose it has to do with this greater quality of skin, which comes from the effect of hormones, a more delicate and sensible skin constitution. Women in ancient Greece tried their best never to stay too long under the sun, as this quality was viewed as an important part of women’s aesthetic. They wanted, as any woman does with the use of make-up today, to accentuate this difference, to help biology a little. Yet, in general, the ratio in skin tone is not radical nor extreme; it's just a bit of a milder shade or tint.
I guess a paler skin therefore might possibly have something to do with the greater effect of hormones in these ladies, but all in all I suppose that they had a tendency to have a paler skin before their orchidectomy, as something natural belonging to their idiosyncratic biology.

I disagree. Some women have paler skin than some men. Similarly there are a great number of men that have paler skin than women. All one can safely say is that some people have paler skin than others. Anything else is just an unscientific generalization.

I disagree with this statement too. I quite sure that one gender's skin does not have any greater quality than the other gender's skin.

Ila, we all want to be politically correct. We all want a society which gives men and women equal rights and equal chances. We all want institutions to treat both men and women alike. But there are definite, strong, very obvious physical differences between human sexes. First, sexual dimorphism is greater in humans than in just about any species of mammals. It doesn’t take much observation to realize it. Not very easy to distinguish between a female and a male cat or dog, for instance. There’s a bit more difference between apes, but far from the differences in humans. This is an evident testimony to one of the means of our survival as a specie: we collaborated by insisting on our sexual differences and aptitudes to adapt. Now, most of any good book on evolution (as long as they haven’t suffered too much influence of some trend in popular culture) will state those facts. And so will most good books on biology. After I read your answer, I googled it to get some infos to present here. Immediately, many came up. I invite you to consult simply Wikipedia on this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans

Let me quote to you what is said for the gender differences in skin:
“Skin
Male skin is thicker (more collagen) and oilier (more sebum) than female skin.[19] They also have redder skin.
The skin of females is warmer on average than that of males. Females tend to have more pain receptors per cm of skin than males.”

The biological creatures that we are also tend (I say “tend”, ila) to view beauty in terms not only of the acknowledgement and accentuation of such differences, but also in terms of capacity to procreate and transmit good genes. Therefore such differences in women’s skin will appear as being more beautiful then that of men (in all respect for divergent sexual desires and orientations, of course), not unlike for instance, the often more pronounced lower back curve in women (a characteristic which allow more room for the uterus and better position for carrying on the one hand, and the fact that it is a sexual position which favors sexual intercourse and is created by neurotransmitters traveling directly in the spine during phases of sexual stimulation, on the other hand) will be perceived often as an element of feminine beauty, amongst many other such physical differences.

Ila, you’re a nice person with good, solid convictions, and a great sense of doing the right thing. And I respect you a lot. I don’t want to be contradictory here. But you have to acknowledge biology. And I mean of course, real biology (beware of what you find out there…).

You have missed the points that I was addressing. I was not and am not trying to be politically correct. If anything I am far from ever being politically correct.

The two statements that I was specifically addressing are:

Women generally have paler skin. That is not true. It's individuals and not genders that have pale skin. For example my skin is as white as a Scandanavian's in winter. However after I've been in the sun for a week or so my skin turns a deep tan.

Women have a greater quality of skin. Nothing in the quoted article has anything to do with quality. It does however state the differences between genders. Quality is subjective, depending on who is doing the measuring.

Start reading the post quietly once again and you might, I say YOU MIGHT understand what I?m saying? If not I can always try to give you a biology course. OK?
I always marvel at how people who don?t understand the first thing about any science are the first to use the term against others.
Of course, there?s differences in individuals, ila! But that goes without saying, does it not?
?Skin
Male skin is thicker (more collagen) and oilier (more sebum) than female skin.[19] They also have redder skin.
The skin of females is warmer on average than that of males. Females tend to have more pain receptors per cm of skin than males.?
These are facts from biology, a science. You mean to say you don?t understand the meaning of men+thicker skin; women+more pain receptors (more sensibility)? You don?t get men+redder skin neither? Really???????

And I should think that you don’t understand the followings about how we tend to feel beauty and desire along such biological differences? It’s academic, ila!!

You should try reading the points that I addressed. Thickness and the number of pain receptors is not a measure of quality. They are simply measurements of thickness and the number of pain receptors.

And it's still individuals and not gender who various shades of skin (and of course race). One only has to look around to confirm this.

I never once brought up feelings for beauty and desire. That has nothing to do with the paleness of one's skin or the quality.

Boys, boys....please play nice. Do I need to separate you two ? ;) ;)

I’m speechless, here. There’s indeed nothing else to add, everything is under your very eyes.
Yet I guess I’ll try to explain a bit more. Ila, you told me first that I was making an “unscientific generalization”. Well, science (biology) does make such a generalization. Of course people have particular physical differences and characteristics, but there is also obviously general differences between sexes (or else, by the way, why would anyone feel she/he is in the wrong body?) If that was your point (that everyone is different), it has nothing to do with what I was saying and therefore it was indeed irrelevant in the first place. In any case, stating that people are different is so obvious, ila, that in itself, it’s an irrelevant intervention. Isn’t it?
Now, the point about desire and beauty is that we, as animals, have biological tendencies to find beautiful and desirable (“quality”, judgement on quality) what favours reproduction, and therefore we see more enhanced sexual (general) characteristics as something more attractive, something that seems to indicate good genes, good carrier of babies, good provider, etc. etc. Do you understand? As I said, this is academic, this has been well established by biology and evolutive sciences forever, ila.
Besides, if you don’t think yourself that is of a greater "quality" a skin which will biologically tend to be paler, finer (thinner) and more sensible than a skin thicker, redder and less sensible, well, yes, there’s no reason for me to discuss endlessly and ridiculously with you…

I’m sorry if I’m getting mad at you here. But ila please, read all the post quietly and try to understand what I wrote, would you? (By the way (and to end this all), we’re not discussing your point! You intervened on mine! We should therefore be discussing mine in all logic, shouldn’t we? It’s one more reason why I’m asking you to read back the posts!)

Sorry for such an ungracious display, lady Alana...

There's no sense in continuing on, because you haven't properly read what I've posted. I'm also not impressed with the condescending tone of your replies.

There does seem to be some talking-past-each-other going on ... believe me, I recognize it when I see it, since I'm guilty of it sometimes.

It?s true. My tone was condescending, and I apologize for that. I was mad and I still am frustrated at the way you intervened, ila, and at the way you choose to envision this. But I admit I lost my temper a bit?

What is done with the balls when they're removed?

Trophies or??

Sometimes, yes :blush:

They would make nice bookends preserved in clear plastic blocks about 4 inches wide and 6 inches high.

I'd love to have her nuts on my desk....

Ball-less
 

......turns me on........I'm new to all this, and for me it will be easier to deal with a gorgeous woman with a cock & no balls (just like dealing with the Domme who ass-fucks me with her strapon).........somehow, sucking down a load of blanks seems easier than sucking down a load of sperm.

I don't understand why somebody who goes to all the effort to be so feminine would want to fight the effects of testosterone at the same time......?

Castrated trannies
 

Some prefer shemales with, others prefer without balls. This is a personal choice and taste. I will not dare define which is better.
From my own transgender experience, I regret I was born too early in a country where having balls removed was absolutely out of question. I would have it done, and maybe the full operation.
About the pictures displayed, I suspect that, unknown from the poster, some TG are actually GG with a Photoshop cock. It is easy to do it on pictures, but not on video clips.
Anyway, TG for ever.

Many consider transgender people through hard movies and pictures. This is only the emersing part of the iceberg. Many TG across the world live as women, part or full time. They do not mean hard sex and care little of being watched. Having the testes removed is a matter of comfort in the panty, and a step to SRS. Sure, it helps lowering the testosterone level in blood, but not in full, since the adrenal glands still produce some. In addition, reduction of body hair, and specially the beard is a myth.

I am afraid many posters simply do not take time to read and understand previous posts before posting themselves questions that have been answered so many times (sigh!...)

GREAT WELL SAID :respect:

Castrated ladyboys
 

Oh yes, that empty sack looks so very exciting to me. Please, no prosthetic balls. Let that sack hang down nice and empty. I love that look!

Charlie

UMMM right :lol:

I agree, I think a tiny little she cock with no accompanying balls is beautiful, so much so I am going to get it done myself.

Totally love the look of a tiny cock and an empty sac. If she could have the sac removed and have small breasts then that would be heaven.
Hope someone out there will post some pictures !

How about some before and after pics.....

Angel: I agree. Would be great to get before & after pics. Nothing nicer than small breasts, tiny cock and very smooth beneath.

allen stretch
 

,'my preference is for a small limp useless penis with large empty sack, which I hope is the catorgory I will fall into when I finally get casrated

Castration
 

Hi,
I am a pre op transsexual and I am hoping to go through the castration process. I am on hormones and it would be easier to accomplish my feminization process. I am small anyway so clothes would fit better.

Robyn

I have been thinking about this and after reading this and some other credible information, well I want to have this done. Can anyone recommend a good surgeon?

Empty sac is so cool. I only have one ball and would love to get rid of the other. Big question...do I need HRT? Really would rather not have to take hormones.

Good ideal snip them off. Nothing more sexy than a naked tgirl with a little soft one.

empty sacks
 

Can ovaries be transplanted into empty sacks?

Wtf!!
 

The short answer is: NO.

If you could transplant reproductive organs, then males that have lost the balls in an accident, and wanted them back. Had have that done ages ago.

My question: What the hell on earth would the idea of such an operation be?

Some one is probably thinking that ovaries in a sack would suffice as hormone replacement.
Putting girlie pictures in the upstairs bedroom does not make it a penthouse.:no:

I, too, have been wondering why anyone would want to transplant ovaries into an empty scrotum. I had hoped that prepuce would tell us the reason for his question. I am not being sarcastic or condescending. I really would like to know the reason for the question.

I'm the opposite. I love the look of no balls and no scrotum. A nice little dick hanging down with nothing below is very hot (IMHO).

Some great crack above, with the usual (for TS forums) crosstalk and missing of point. Anyway 'castration' which is usually called orchidectomy or orchiectomy, is useful mainly because the use of androgen blockers is regarded as being hazardous in the longer term.

Hormonal transition for mtf requires two completely different processes: 1, the suppression of the effects of testosterone, which masculinise the body and 2, the use of female hormones, principally oestrogen, to feminise it.

Some transwomen who self-med blitz with so much oestrogen that their testosterone just can't get through, but this risks liver damage and in any case is inefficient. Furthermore, oestrogen is implicated in certain forms of cancer, notably breast cancer, especially at higher levels. Using a proper androgen blocker, eg androcur or spirolactone, stops the testosterone and allows feminisation at lower and therefore safer doses of oestrogen. But the androgen blockers also have risks, which include memory loss, osteoporosis and muscular atrophy.

Ordinary women produce testosterone, just not so much; getting the anti-androgen balance right to replicate this level in the mtf is not at all easy. (Too much anti-androgen=no testosterone=problems; not enough=masculinisation.) This is one reason why self-medicating is a Bad Idea.

This female testosterone is not, obviously, produced in the testes but elsewhere, and it is also produced in these places in the male body. Removing an mtf transsexual's testes allows her body to self-regulate the testosterone at about the female level with no androgen blockers. (Essentially, the endocrine system is fooled into thinking the body is female, but lacks the ability to produce female levels of oestrogen itself. So, after orchidectomy, an mtf's body is very like that of a woman who has had her ovaries removed. Remember, we all began as females. The body just reverts.)

So 'castration' allows the use of smaller and safer doses of oestrogen to allow the feminisation required for mtf transition. (Note: anyone who has been castrated will have to take HRT to prevent problems. This was an issue for many early transitioners, notably April Ashley, who developed severe osteoporosis because she did not.)

Do you see? (Phew.)

In broader terms the physiological trick in SRS is done by the removal of the testes. The actual construction of the vagina is just cosmetic surgery, though I realise how important it can be for many girls. But that's really a psychological issue to do with her sense of gender and self, and not the fairly mechanical processes of her endocrine system.

Some girls report that after orchidectomy their erectile ability recovers. This is probably because they had previously been over-suppressing their testosterone. Others, however, report the opposite or no change.

BTW that nonsense above about skin--the differences between male and female skin is caused by hormonal action. Any transsexual will tell you the differences in her skin and hair are obvious when she is on hormones. These have no effect whatsoever, however, on underlying skin tone, which is genetic, not hormonal, in origin. In other words, under controlled oestrogen therapy, a scandic male will become a scandic female, a dark-skinned male will become a dark-skinned female.

Need some help. Only have one ball and wondering best way to get rid of 2nd. Would alcohol castration work best? Goal to totally get rid of empty sack.

VERY Well said Hank!

Marcie

The full Monty
 

I like a good set of balls on my girls. There is just something sweet to have a set of balls hanging just below my chin as I suck. Gives me something else to enjoy:)

Well said Hank!

but from my point of view my testicals had to go, im not going to need them !

Castrated Trannies
 

As for me I wish to find Master who likes castrated shemales, who wants to turn a CD into castrated Shemale, who want to have his own sex slave Shemale, men's whore. Master, who wish to watch the step by step process of transformation from CD man into TS Shemale with hormones, permanent epilation, face feminisation surgery and surgical castration (balls and scrotum removal). I wish to be transformed that way from Sub CD man into TS Shemale - special kind of woman, woman with real woman appearance, with the grown up real female breast, woman face and woman figure, but with a cock (SRS should be never done). I dream to have my place between my cock and asspussy looks flat and thmoos, like it was never anything there beforehand. Wish the process of my transformation will be documented with movie and pictures...

My castration
 

i am still trying to find a decent surgeon to do the work without it being some kind of back street special as it were.

photos will be posted once the work has been done

SbDm59: I eagerly await your transformation!!!

If you able and wish to help me to do that transformation you can have your own castrated shemale.

yes
 

I have to agree Tailia for several reasons, their body becomes more feminine after castration, with lovely curves, they still have a penis, they are now more female than male and I like them done. However can they still cum a little afterwards? I have read that some can still have an orgasm but cannot ejaculate just a little clear fluid, any thoughts

My experiences after castration suggest that ejaculation is blocked. In fact, low levels of testosterone help in feminization but libido isn't too high.

Sweetheart, it's only my own opinion, of course, but I do think that castration would do its best if done in your teens. Now it would only smoothen your look, but does not bring you the necessary changes you're so eager about... ;)

I approved, the problem of hair arises after puberty. It is difficult to get rid of male characteristics once go beyond this.

Not so guys.

Eliminating gonadal testosterone (the adrenal gland still produces some) will have several beneficial effects long after puberty.

Body hair regrowth (but NOT beard, sadly) will slow, if not stop entirely. The skin will soften.

Many of us choose to remove testosterone from the equation either surgically or chemically. It allows a reduction in oestrogen dose - which is a marked benefit in itself. In fact, for some eliminating the testosterone allows their own natural oestrogen levels to achieve some feminisation particularly of breasts.

I've been testosterone free for 18 months or so and the body hair regrowth between waxing sessions has been reduced to such an extent that my upper body only needs waxing every 6-8 weeks versus 3-4 originally.

The other major benefit is protection of the scalp hair. Some form of blocking of DHT is necessary, whether by Dutasteride, Finasteride or surgery to prevent or even, in a limited fashion, reverse male pattern hair loss.

I'd go the surgical route in a heartbeat.

THANK YOU. We need more of this info!

Mature Sub CD Bottom looking
 

I'm mature Sub CD Bottom 61-5'6"-145lbs, proportional tend to petite body, clean, healthy, DD free and HIV-, discreet, reliable, sensitive, sensual, patient, submissive and obedient, but kinky and perverted. I'm looking for genuine people who want and able to turn me into castrated Shemale, with hormones, permanent epilation, surgical face feminisation and surgical castration (balls and scrotum removal)...

Definitely NO! All kinds of do-it-yourself methods are very dangerous. Try to find a qualified doctor.

There is also another forum, where this subject is discussed more detailed: eunuch.org. But the serious people there, will have the same advice for you.

I like the look of the lonely small limp cock with the flat place between cock and asspussy hole, with the look like it was never been there before...
Wish the same will be done on me (my balls and scrotum removed)....

A couple posts up-- it is laughable in my mind to even think of a male-identifying cross dresser to want to go the hormone and surgical route as part of some sex fetish. Surgery and hormones are for trans-identifying individuals and are specifically indicated to treat gender dysphoria. This is a distinct identity issue that is wholly separate from getting your bedroom kicks by "forced feminization." If you were a real transexual, you would simply work towards doing what you need to do, not be posting in an internet forum hoping to find someone to help do it for you. Such an attitude is quite frankly insulting to all of brave transexual individuals who have the intestinal fortitude to live authentically.

Re: Castration...Yeah, I'd like to have this done at some point. I'd need to see costs, but from what I understand, this operation only runs a few thousand. And truly, this is the operation that has a lot of physical benefit in terms of adjusting hormone levels in the body. I find that alone to be more appealing than vaginoplasty. As to impacting orgasm and ejaculation-- I can very rarely do either. I actually managed to ejaculate a small amount the other day for the first time in some months. And that is on hormones alone, so any additional impact from removal of the testes would not be disagreeable to me.

A few thousands, seriously? I just came across this post by accident, but that's ridiculous. Here in Belgium that would probably cost you a few hundreds...

I believe I saw $4000 cited by one study. Gotta love American healthcare. Smh

I am quite orgasmic post-orchi and also my libido is intact. But I have dry orgasms and multi-orgasms especially when being fucked by man who knows what he's doing.

It can take me quite a long time to orgasm. Sometimes I can't at all even after hours of sex. But that can even be better than an orgasm. After your man has gotten off, maybe two or three times, and he tires out, you can be left there burning up, totally in heat and turned on by making HIM orgasm.

Then you slowly have to cool down without an orgasm. I find this to be an exquisite submissive experience, especially when he wakes up and fucks me more. It is very difficult to explain...

I think that her other name is Sarina Valentina and she has definitely been castrated now.

When she was "Alexis" she has balls her body and face are MUCH more feminine now !

I totally can understand this. I am not castrated at this point, but simply low testosterone levels are probably similar.

That is normal. Hair growth comes in stages. When you first wax, the hair that isn't waxed may be in a cycle where it is about to grow back. the more you rip the hair out then the less you have to wax. Eyebrows are the perfect example. The more you pluck the less they will grow back. Eventually they may not or they may be so thin. Remember the pencil thin brows? Now some women don't grow them thick enough and need o use brow brushes and so on. Personally I love thinner brows. I still have to pluck though but not as often.

Facial hair sux but wax it a few times if you can handle it and then it is the same as the brows, legg, underarms and such. But HOLY SHIT. It hurts.

I like how it looks with no sack nice flat and smooth but on the other hand i like sucking on the balls so either way works for me

Helping to understand please
 

So the question, I am married and we and his wife have 3 children and do not want more. Will secure sexs without a condom and safe completion will get an wife. I was born with only one egg the other is not, therefore, decided not to his wife spiral, but I make the operation then there are two ways to cut the egg or sperm channel all their cut on the field? We do not see both my wife and I no longer need my egg.
PS : help big thanks.:inlove:

I think it all started here years ago. I looked at pictures of castradet shemales, clean skin, beautiful breasts and between legs Dick.
Empty bag below, either hanging leather, or tight smooth and tight as there would never be anything. I imagined how I would look without the nuts.

At the same time I was on the site bodymod and saw photos of the modified penis. I liked what it looked like meatomy or subincision,
and I liked it myself. I started to slowly open the urethra with litle cuts.
And in a year and a half I had an over inch subicision. I liked how it looked and felt.

I have never liked the pubic hair, I was probably about twenty before my pubic hairs were growing. I've had most of my life have been shaved. After about five years of my subincision,
I decided that I will never be a decent hair. I started using wax strips and epilator. In the beginning it was quite painful, but it is getting easier, the hair grows less and slower.

It took a while for five years and I wanted to continue my subincision. My foreskin was able to cover the incision when the cock was soft,
now I wanted to see how far it would be possible. So I continued cutting, the goal stood halfside arm and no longer matter if it should be open all the time.
It took another one and a half years. The problem was that the incision grew quickly back. But it succeeded, the bow was cracked below, over 2 1/2 inches it seemed to be a lot.

Bodymod sites increased the number of pictures and the writing about castratio, or it started to interest me more.
I noticed I wanted my testicles out.
It was no longer so easy. I did not thinking to cut the bag myself open and take the balls into the jar. At the same time as I got my subincision finished,
I got an answer from the cutter who was ready to do it and still at a reasonable price. It changed everything, I was able to become eunuch.
I'm looking at the year, all about castration and different options. I found out I wanted it, I really wanted. After this year, I decided, I'll do it, my balls can going to go.

The cutter would have been the best option, but it is a little risk, can not know for sure safe. Another thing to explain to a wife or doctor when I go to ask for treatment of testosterone.
My solution was to kill the testicles with alcohol injections and after they died to get them removed in the hospital. Half a year and 11 injections,
and the balls were very hard, and a little touch-sensitive. Urolig suspected cancer of the testicle. The right was removed. A few months later, the left inflamed and was also removed.
There do not find a cancer. It was not an easy road, a lot of pain and even despair.

Now that I look at myself between the legs or the mirror I just see what I wanted. The same thing I see here in the pictures. I spread every morning testogel to the skin,
I have hairy breasts, maybe slightly grown. I can get an erection and cum, but I'm eunuch. I think I can litle understand what these beautiful shemals think when considering castration.
They have a lot more on the game than I do. I like all the time more, the fact that I made a decision to be eunuch.

I've never met shemale, I'm getting the courage to do it. I would be ready for sex with a shemale, caressing her body and feeling proud caressing my skin.
I would be willing to go that.

Doctors are not at all willing to remove functional testicles. They want to save them until the last.

there are many of us who would give anything to look more fem and be castrated. I know I would.

castration
 

I think castration should be elective , if you want it done then a doctor should do it. you can have a nose job , boob job , mastectomy , why not castration. I also think srs, and nullo, both male and female should be elective too. what do you folks say?

I'm a big fan of Sarina Valentina and would very much like to see earlier pictures of her when she was Alexis. I can't find any such pictures. Are you able to post a link please. Thank you.

Ive been on finasteride for at least 4 years now and in that time my body has changed , weak erections, little or no ejaculate less body hair no more hairloss low libido plus a few other changes. I belive the effects of the drug have semi chemical castrated me and i enjoy my new body. One day in the near future i hope to have them removed.

As a castrated
 

It was the best thing I did

My libido dropped drastically, but over time I've become quite a nympho. I do consider having my testes removed from time to time. In the end I just want the most appealing result to others.

My opinion is that you should only do what appeals to yourself. After all people come and go, but you will be with yourself for your entire life so please yourself and not others.

Do an "Alexis" search on imagefap.com (shemale category) and you will see pictures of her
when she was "Alexis".

It's solid advice, but we both know the world is more complicated than having our cake and eating it too. Thank you for the support.