|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Bookmark & Share  |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#751
09-17-2011
|
||||
|
||||
When I first got on this forum I thought of myself as 100% straight, then later on I thought of myself as Bi. Nowadays, I just think of myself as gay. If I have daily fantasies of T-girls fucking me and cumming on my face then I must be gay. I'm still not attracted to men in anyway, but I don't know how I could be straight with the kind of fantasies I have. Anyway, this is just my personal opinion.
|
|
#753
09-21-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Amen, It doesn't matter what label you use or what someone else calls you. If you are happy with your life, not ashamed about your desires, then just enjoy life. It's too short to worry about other individuals' thoughts. I love ladyboys, shemales and women. Just enjoy!!
Quote:
|
|
#754
09-21-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#755
10-10-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
What I am about to say does not refer to the lovely intelligent transsexuals that post on this forum. They are special people that I fully respect.
I want to talk about the inner sexual feelings that attracted me to this forum to discuss what can be regarded as unusual sexual urges and fantasies. These are my conclusions and opinions and I don't expect a lot of agreement. The attached images of the lovely femboy Cartoon, before he got "her" boobs got me thinking about what it means to be gay. After being on the forum for years, I have come to difficult conclusions. First, it was a shock to realize that the beautiful shemales that I fantasize about do not want to be "hung" shemales, most of them want to transition to having female genitalia even some of the famous porn stars want to do it. The genitalia attributes that make her so attractive are not desired by her. So where does that leave my sexual fantasies? I am saddened to realize that the beautiful shemales that I love and wish to experience sucking their lovely shecocks do not have the same view of their genitalia as I do. In fact most transsexuals would like to get rid of their male genitalia, they want a female pussey. Second, it’s time for me to open my mind to what I am and what I want. Do I really want sex with a shemale that is no longer capable of cumming or even having an erection? Don't I really want someone with fully functional male genitalia capable of hard horny cumming? I think what I want is not a hormone loaded impotent shemale but a pretty boy with a nice fully functional cock that I can love and suck and enjoy load after lode of sweet cum. That is what I really want. So face it, I am GAY! If I want to suck cock, I am GAY. If I want to be fucked by cock, I am GAY. So be it! Finally admitting that I am gay is a very liberating experience, I can now relax and enjoy what I really want, lots of horny cock sucking/fucking sex. Save up your money and head to Pattaya and find some fully functional femboys "ladyboys" and spend night after night doing what you always wanted to do suck a cum filled "ladyboy" cock, fuck and be fucked. Hey, hey, It's OK being GAY! 
__________________
"Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible; but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary." R.N. Last edited by randolph; 10-10-2011 at 07:14 PM.
|
|
#756
10-10-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure if I've posted this here before or not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY711HJK7pg "We're all gay, it's just to what extent are you gay."
__________________
Just because I'm telling you this story doesn't mean that I'm alive at the end of it. If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. DEO VINDICE
|
|
#757
10-11-2011
|
|||
|
|||
|
Everybody has their own feelings and so do I. First of all who cares what other people say or put labels on. Each individual likes what they like, I myself is attracted to females and tgirls. Always like the sensual ways of beautiful girls and more lately have the curiousity of tgirls. Maybe its the thought of having ass play(on me) with my girlfriend that excites me or the fact that taboo sex really intriques me. Anyway, fuck people who judge other people, let us enjoy what we like. By the way my ultimate fantasy is being fuck by a hot Tgirl while a hot girl sits on my face. dick and pussy united.
Quote:
Last edited by smc; 10-12-2011 at 07:13 AM.
|
|
#758
11-20-2011
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to say that I gave this some thought. I initially thought I am bisexual. However, I am into girls like Kimber James when it comes to ladyboys -- I love Asian ladies as well. I am not into men's bodies or hairy guys or muscular guys. When I see guys at the gym I get no sense of attraction to them. I doubt that this means I am gay or bisexual. I would suck dick, but I am not into the idea of being fucked by a ladyboy. I doubt this makes me gay, maybe a little bi? Not sure.
|
|
#760
11-28-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok
I stand corrected Quote:
|
|
#761
11-29-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wouldn't say so, no. I mean, obviously it isn't right at the furthest 'straight' end of the spectrum, but it's not as far over as homosexual - males sexualy interested in males and masculinity.
Sophie.
|
|
#764
12-13-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
So what?
1) Homosexuality is legal in most cultures. 2) In Greek and Roman times a man would marry to produce children, but if he wanted some extra fun would find himself a teenage boy. 3) If we're to believe Freud, then self/mother/same sex/opp. sex love is somewhat flexible. 4) If you're a guy at a nudist beach/bathroom/changing room - don't you look at the other guys' dicks? Gay/straight - don't be so suburban!
|
|
#765
12-14-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#766
12-14-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The point is that putting labels on people quickly creates boundaries and limits.
|
|
#767
12-14-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#768
12-16-2011
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#769
06-13-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Am I gay?
Hi all,
I'm sure this is quite a common topic of discussion, but I am quite confused about this. Firstly I very much like girls, however I am very turned on by Ladyboys. I am attracted to feminine looking ladyboys, and am very turned on by their cocks. To clarify I don't find men attractive just ladyboys with big hard cocks.  When I watch Trans porn, I only like watching stuff where the Tgirls penetrate the guys, and put it in the guys mouths. I fantasise about being in their place receiving it in my ass and mouth and having them cum in me. That really turns me on, but only Tgirls not men. What does that make me???
|
|
#770
06-13-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have loved tgirls for many years - in fact I like all women. I have never considered myself gay for I do not fancy men. Tgirls are feminine, soft and sweet - women in every sense but with something extra. I have always respected tgirls for they know who they are and what they want to be - not always easy in a world like ours.
|
|
#771
06-13-2012
|
||||
|
||||
I'm also not too content with labeling oneself one thing or the other! It doesn't really mean anything to be proud of being something you have no control over! You should be proud in your personal achievements not in being gay, or black, or whatever similar stuff people parade about. It just seems silly to me.
I say that it's alright to be and do as you like, as long as you are not harming a third party (without their consent, I put this in bracket because some people are into that fetish, I don't judge )If you commit crimes you deserve to be labelled a 'criminal'.
__________________
Benjamin Franklin: Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time, for that is the stuff life is made of.
|
|
#772
06-13-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#773
06-13-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#774
06-13-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Depends on who you ask. If you ask the Catholic Church and Reverend Jimmy Swaggert, or even Billy Graham, they will say you are.
Most of the people here will say no. Then, if you are asking others this question on the forum, it would mean to me that you are excited about showing off your sexuality to others, especially when your new to this scene.
|
|
#775
06-13-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#776
06-13-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#778
06-15-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Great post Jodie! Yup! Top Gun may have more gay metaphors than any "straight" movie to ever come out of Hollywood! Iceman and Maverick? Give me a break! LOL!
__________________
Melissa Pink Transcougar and Kinky Cum Slut Last edited by Melissa Pink; 06-15-2012 at 10:37 AM.
|
|
#779
06-17-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
New to Ladyboys/Shemales I am Straight? Never messed around w a Man no desire to
I am a straight identified man, I have never been with another guy, and I am not turned on by mens bodies in the slightest. When I see athletic/muscled/hairy guys at the gym I am turned off and uninterested. I am really into ladyboys or shemales or whatever it is I should be refering to them as. I show respect to everyone but I don't think I am gay or bi. IS anyone else here this way?????
|
|
#780
06-17-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello, gobucks789.
Well, many here are on the same principal as yours. Some are turned on by a cock which means they can be attracted to men but not because they are the same gender but because of the penis. What I mean is, that for now you truly believe that you are turned on only by a shemale/transsexual/ladyboy etc. But after some time you could find yourself turned on by a penis. You may not like how the men look but once they're naked and you see their hard cock you can think of it more intimately. After all, as long as you are attracted by boobs, tits, pussy, you are straight on this but the likeness of cocks may make be a bi-sexual. This means you are attracted to both genders. You can define yourself by exploring more of your interests and by giving your lust a result, some action. But for now, no you're not gay. You can be a bi-sexual but for now you're thinking only shemales, I believe.
|
|
#783
06-25-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just wanted to chime in w/ my 2??sexuality and gender I.D. Is such a complicated subject. I think that in the next 20 years, most of these complicated "labels" that Christian society wants to put on everything will disappear. The way I see it is that there is "masculine" and "feminine" and that is completely seperate from the amount of X and Y chromosomes you have and it can change for each person at any time.
I consider myself masculine and I am attracted to feminine. I love feminine women and men. Having a penis or vagina does not matter to me. There are some times I like to pretend to be feminine, though not convincingly, for sexual fun. I would never think of trying to be feminine full time as it is just not who I am. This has always been confusing to me until lately because I am completely in interested in "men" sexually but when a feminine guy has a pretty face, throws on a skirt and stockings, and is naturally feminine, I am all in. Even with a strong attraction to these feminine men I never have considered myself "gay" I it really irritates me when people try to label me as gay.
|
|
#784
06-25-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#785
06-25-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#786
06-25-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
gay
I don't think just liking shemales makes you gay, but with me I love to suck cock,
 but I also love someone beautiful and sexy, so you could say I'm bi, because I suck sissyboy cock too, or femboys. But shemales are at the top of my list
|
|
#787
06-26-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#788
06-26-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not necessarily. I like the fact that if you're turned on by any beautiful person be it a man or woman or ladyboy/transsexual that it just means you're fluid in your sexuality. Not that it's wrong thinking it may make you gay but I don't think it does. Just my two cents.
__________________
"There's something about that girl..."
|
|
#789
07-07-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
I of course would answer NO with almost all of you. But i suppose in the end, the whole question is about semantics, an exercise in which we can loose a life of mouth twisting acrobatics.
Anyone heard about the Kinsey scale ? As you probably pretty much all already know, Alfred Kinsey is an entomologist who decided to start researching sexuality in the US in the 40s. He definitly was the greatest precursor to the sexual revolution in the Western World, from which we all benefit on this very forum. The two reports he published revealed facts nobody could then possibly envisioned about the sexual practices of americans. Anyways he created a scale which illustrated the potential sexual orientation of individuals. It is divided in six vertical columns, the first one to the left representing people exclusively heterosexuals, the one to the extreme right people exclusively homosexuals. Now the four remaining columns were of course to represent what's left in between: the second one to the left, people who for instance had gay fantasies at time, or one or a few gay experiences in their youth, in other words those who were, as he said, more or less "incidently" gay, and so on in a gradual progression to the column next to the last at right, which designated people with only more or less limited experiences in heterosexuality. Kinsey found that a surprisingly moderate proportion of the population fitted, according to age, in either of the two extremities. The bulk of it belonged to the four remaining ones. In other words, a majority of people had at least some kind of inclinations towards bisexuality ! What seems to me even more interresting about that scale is the indeniable fact (still denied nontheless to this day by moronic, thight asses moral extremists) that nothing is either black and white when it comes to human sexuality; everything is blissfully grey. And in the end it's so much like us, human beings. It's part of our beauty ! such diversity and creativity, such differences ! Don't know why we constantly have to make it the root of our dissensions... (I simplified things a bit, here. I have to admit i'm not sure i understand enough Kinsey's methodology to explain it remotly properly in english. In any case, here's the link to the scale at Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale -I'm sorry i'm not pc cleaver enough neither to post it here myself). Last edited by dan; 07-07-2012 at 08:19 AM.
|
|
#790
07-07-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Kinsey Scale Rating Description 0 Exclusively heterosexual 1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual 2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual 3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual 4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual 5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual 6 Exclusively homosexual X Non-sexual And attached is a graph representation of the same.
|
|
#791
07-07-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do not consider myself homosexual even if I am dating a transwoman,
I like breasts and she has them. Funny thing though I was in New York in 2002 and in a bar I encountered a homosexual couple that told me they were gay, I as a non English speaker thought they meant that they were happy and joyful so I asked them any particular reason which rendered me a strange look.
|
|
#792
07-07-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by dan; 07-07-2012 at 12:48 PM.
|
|
#794
07-07-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This word "semantics" has, over the centuries, become misused in popular parlance. I make this point because what danthepoetman says is "about semantics" -- assumedly referring to different word choices that cannot be resolved because different people use words different ways (the typical meaning of the phrase "a question of semantics") -- has real consequences in real life. Semantics is a branch of my academic field, linguistics, and it is about meaning. It is the study of what things mean. Those things are words, phrases, symbols, and signs. Semanticists study what they denote, or stand for. In linguistics, we use semantics to understand how humans express meaning through their language. When the phrase "semantic question" is used colloquially, it more often than not is describing that humans cannot agree on meaning because of word selection. The problem with the popular use of the phrase is that it is also more often than not used to dismiss further discussion on the assumption that it is mere word choices (of, assumedly, broadly defined synonyms) that constitute the difference, and not really meaning. (That's why you will often hear the use of the phrase accompanied by "we mean the same thing" or "I think we're talking past each other"). Therein lies the problem in what danthepoetman writes. It is the same problem I have raised in this thread over and again. Words do matter, especially labeling words, and labeling words that are associated with human prejudices (e.g., gay, transsexual, etc.). matter perhaps even more. These words are used to dismiss and discriminate against others. They are used to subjugate humans and subvert rights. It is not a "question of semantics" in the way that phrase is used in popular parlance, to dismiss differences in choices of words that mean essentially the same thing I wrote some time ago in this thread: Quote:
Quote:
Unfortunately, society is not so yielding. We will all be better off when it is, and sexuality is defined not in terms of labels but in terms of, for want of a better phrase, nothing. When discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is non-existent, there will be no need for any labels. They are primarily for drawing differences so that discriminatory behavior can be enabled. Some day (we can dream), humans will simply be defined as sexual beings, and where we fall on the spectrum will be as inconsequential (other than for our own personal reasons) as whether we have long or short fingers. (Okay, I admit finger length has consequences if you play certain musical instruments. )
|
|
#796
07-08-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post #700.
[I won't quote that long #700 post which i here refer to]
smc, you understand precisely what i mean and i wholeheartedly agree with everything that follows in your post. Thank you for making up for my shortcommings in english, which i repeat is not my mother tongue nor my usual language of expression (i also made svartekaptenen's funny confusion the first time). The syntactic elegance of your thoughts expresses much more explicitly what i was awkwardly trying to say, even by bringing up the Kinsey scale, and of course, it expresses even much more. Intolerance or rather should i say, a lack of acceptance is the root of the problem, but since it is so widespread in our still hypocritical (see the scale) society, you are absolutly right that we need to insist on the meaning of words relating to people's values and choices as not only to show respect and understanding but as to establish it in language. Needless to say here i did not intend to diminish in any way such a field of study as liguistic, knowing how much efforts scholarly achievments requires. (Must say, though, i now feel a bit embarrassed having needed the help of two mods to make a point...) PS. You can just call me "dan". "Poetman" is the domain i've inherrited from my proud ancestral family, and "the" is the nobility particle. But i'm not a snob for that matter...
Last edited by dan; 07-08-2012 at 02:26 AM.
|
|
#797
08-23-2012
|
||||
|
||||
|
it bothers me too
I feel attracted and excited fancying being fucked hard by shemales however have n interest in men.. that leaves me confused @ times..
|
|
#798
08-24-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
honestly i don't care what it makes me... i don't care what anyone thinks about what i've done. i live life like this: if you want to do something do it...
when i was 18 i wanted to fuck a dude... so i did and loved it... does that make me gay? i don't think so because it's purely sexual, i define gay as being romantically attached to the same sex... when i was 22 i wanted to fuck a shemale (well i've always wanted to) and thankfully my first shemale was drop dead gorgeous with a nice big dick... great fuck such a turn on, had me hooked. if i had to choose between being with a woman for the rest of my life or a shemale, considering they were the same person character wise... i'd choose a shemale 10/10 times
|
|
#799
08-24-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
Likewise I feel the same.
I think I would enjoy a trans in my relationship. I can say for sure I have never looked at a man the way I look at a t-girl. Problem is I would like to find some so I can see if it feels right having a relationship. So far my success of finding one dismal at best.
|
|
#800
08-27-2012
|
|||
|
|||
|
No it dosen't make you gay. I love women, maybe too much... I have to watch myself as I have some ladies in the family I have had sex with and others I would love to have sex with (as well as women outside the family...just sayin'), but I am attracted to ladyboys as well! Just letting you know a lot of people I've met have other kinks and fetishes along with wanting a gurl to cum down your throat. Something about a feminine body with a hard cock that, well, makes me wanna jump on 'em!
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If I could make you come... | WudLuv2try | Member Introductions and Pictures | 10 | 11-08-2014 03:54 PM |
| what age did you first start liking shemales?? | zoftigz | Chat About Shemales | 124 | 06-10-2013 02:21 AM |
Linear Mode
