Thread: A major problem with shemale porn
View Single Post
  #18  
Old 05-30-2010
shadows's Avatar
shadows shadows is offline
Dark Overlord
  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,408
shadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud ofshadows has much to be proud of
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
I know this topic is months old but I have something to say.

The more and more I look at shemale sites the more discrimination I see against American Shemales. Very few companies are will to shoot them. Most of these girls are more popular than the majority of foreign T-Girls. There is no way in hell that an unpassable foreign shemale should have more movies than someone like Vanity. It has noting to do with the girl being fore foreign. It just a fact that Vanity is extremely popular. Why do plenty of unknown girls have more scenes than Vanity? Kimber James has less scenes than plenty of unpopular or unknown foreign shemales.

Shemale Yum, Shemale Pornstar, Shemale Club, T-Girl Network, and TS Seduction are the main producers of English shemale porn. That is five sites out of hundreds of pay sites. That is huge!

Look at other types of porn. Most other types of porn are filmed in all languages and plenty of each language.
Perhaps it comes down to cost? It could be that a model of Kimber James' (I'm just using her name as an example) stature would cost a company more money than some of the relatively unknown models from Brazil? I have no idea if this is the case or not, but it sounds plausible. Tom Cruise can command(or at least he could in his heyday) twenty million dollars to star in a movie, yet the studio could hire numerous lesser known actors for the same total price. Perhaps this is an example of something similar?
Reply With Quote