05-21-2012
|
|
Senior Ladyboy Lover
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Boston area, U.S.A.
Posts: 18,084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussiepride
Oh sorry I wasnt tought in school that google overdides stringent testing of hypothesis, as was once considered "shown scientifically"
Seems you can get anything published these days and it's considered fact.
Most humans still engage in monogamy, but then again I didn't test that statement, so perhaps it's not true..
|
If you had actually looked at Google Scholar, or knew anything about it, you wouldn't have been so quick to assume that it is just like "googling" something generally, and then you might not have dug yourself into the hole of writing something so profoundly ignorant in an effort to make what I wrote seem stupid.
Google Scholar is a search engine for research articles published in peer-reviewed, academic journals published worldwide. It's has absolutely nothing to do with the ability to "get anything published." But, hey, I give you credit for trying to respond.
As for your second point, the fact that humans engage in something doesn't make it the natural state of things. Do you think enslaving other humans is a natural state for the human race? Or do you think that those who enslave may think it is natural (and thus okay) because it was done in the generations that preceded their lives? Do you think the nature vs. nurture argument is a legitimate one for serious researchers?
(By the way, most humans accepted slavery in the U.S. South during a long period of America's history ... "but then again I didn't test that statement, so perhaps it's not true.")
Or, does real science and real scholarship, not the crap you're trying to associate with me through your insipid Google comment, hurt your brain?
Last edited by smc; 05-21-2012 at 11:43 PM.
|