View Single Post
  #17  
Old 10-25-2009
Tread's Avatar
Tread Tread is offline
Senior Ladyboy Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Tread is a glorious beacon of lightTread is a glorious beacon of lightTread is a glorious beacon of lightTread is a glorious beacon of lightTread is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardSinclair View Post
Then I read Tread's post and it made me realise that if I were to follow this point of view I could no longer fantasize about any one person that hasn't given me consent to fantasize about them. I would only be allowed to fantasize about people who had given me consent to fantasize about them, regardless of my urges. I suppose it would make sense from a morality point of view, but would be impractical in practice, because one would need a will of steel!!
I think you misinterpreted me. That's not my point of view.
Not all will be jubilant if someone fantasizes about them, especially if it gets visualized. But everyone fantasize from, only in mind, writing stories, making pictures, to making a movie. From romantic to pornographic. From realistic to surreal.
No one should feel hurt by a fantasy.

I have moral problems when reality gets consciously twisted, someone spreads an untrue rumour and public take this for the truth, or fake pictures are made to proof something that is not true.
And I have moral problems when real pictures, that show private incidents, get in public to badmouth someone.
Reply With Quote