Another derogatory, offensive and spiteful post.
I know about scholar, and as far as research into this field.. I have actually been reading it for many years.
Your use of an example of slavery is downright mind boggling and does not help the argument one bit. Equating that lots of people appear to stay monogamous , is like how slavery was what we all use to do..? How is that te se at all? Seems to me a profoundly ignorant thing to say...
TESTING a theory or idea about monogamy is inherently hard to do... Gathering some statistical data that "men like to fool around" is neither good science nor proof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smc
If you had actually looked at Google Scholar, or knew anything about it, you wouldn't have been so quick to assume that it is just like "googling" something generally, and then you might not have dug yourself into the hole of writing something so profoundly ignorant in an effort to make what I wrote seem stupid.
Google Scholar is a search engine for research articles published in peer-reviewed, academic journals published worldwide. It's has absolutely nothing to do with the ability to "get anything published." But, hey, I give you credit for trying to respond.
As for your second point, the fact that humans engage in something doesn't make it the natural state of things. Do you think enslaving other humans is a natural state for the human race? Or do you think that those who enslave may think it is natural (and thus okay) because it was done in the generations that preceded their lives? Do you think the nature vs. nurture argument is a legitimate one for serious researchers?
(By the way, most humans accepted slavery in the U.S. South during a long period of America's history ... "but then again I didn't test that statement, so perhaps it's not true.")
Or, does real science and real scholarship, not the crap you're trying to associate with me through your insipid Google comment, hurt your brain?
|