Things I don't like about shemale pics

[Mel Asher]

I don't like shemale / transexual pictures where the star(s) make no attempt to be feminine, but achieve the turn-on simply by the demonstration of raw porn.

That is not to say I can't be switched on by the sight of a sexy back, tantalising balls or inviting cock, but I like to be able to use my imagination a bit !

Any thought from other members ?

Call me :innocent: by all means ! !

[transjen]

I take it you prefer the glamour shots over the porn shots, Sadly the glamour shots are for magazines and covers for the DVDS and VHS tapes while during the movie action is more important hence they don't looks as nice mainly because people want to see the girl sucking and taking it in her backdoor :eek: Jennifer

[puck]

on the whole the photography is dreadful, the photographers inept and worse. It is clear that probably the models get very little money for the shoots, have no say in the final released pictures, and perhaps could care less. In complete opposition, the Russian shemales who charge a grand a night have the best pictures taken by a creative , professional photographer.
They are visual business cards but even the ordinary prostitutes have very good pictures and may have something to do with self-esteem as well. There seem to be a fair number of drugged/drunk shemales posing and some I would guess that are/seem embarrased to be posing.
There are occasionally very good pictures of solo modelling by shemales with a mix of male/female eroticism. The high quality of say Met-Art is never achieved. I should say that I don't pay for any site, I view free material and my judgements are based on that though I suspect because a picture is large in pixels (paid sites) doesn't necessarily make it any better in creativity. Of what I have seen, I would say that the Thai shemale pictures are probably the most professional looking.

[franalexes]

My profile picture is there if you hunt for it. Let your imagination run wild.