only shemales?

[justforKicks]

i always here people on this forum talk about how they like genetic woman and trannsexuals or men and trannsexuals. now this may be a stupid question but is there anybody who only really gets churned on by shemales like i do :confused:

[Interesting]

Well, if you're purely speaking from a sexual stand point, and i'm assuming it's porn related, then you simply have a case of the fetish.

after a while of being exposed to the enormous volume of pornographic material that is available, people tend to form fetishes, and those fetish seem to dominate what makes them 'turn on'.

[JodieTs]

is there anybody who only really gets churned on by shemales like i do :confused:

I used to feel like that a long long time ago.
These days my mobile (cellphone) phonebook is now full the private numbers of Pre-op transsexual women, "Shemales". :confused:
And ironically, they would be my last choice in a 'Bed partner'
Life is an ironic bitch, like that....

[smc]

i always here people on this forum talk about how they like genetic woman and trannsexuals or men and trannsexuals. now this may be a stupid question but is there anybody who only really gets churned on by shemales like i do :confused:

"Churned" on? Is this about sex or butter? :lol:

[smc]

Well, if you're purely speaking from a sexual stand point, and i'm assuming it's porn related, then you simply have a case of the fetish.

after a while of being exposed to the enormous volume of pornographic material that is available, people tend to form fetishes, and those fetish seem to dominate what makes them 'turn on'.

First, the OP asked whether there are any others here "who only really gets churned on by shemales like i do" -- not for psychoanalysis.

Of course, when posting a generalization seems to be the objective ... :rolleyes:

[Interesting]

First, the OP asked whether there are any others here "who only really gets churned on by shemales like i do" -- not for psychoanalysis.

Of course, when posting a generalization seems to be the objective ... :rolleyes:


1. Psychoanalysis is the wrong term, more like astute observation and connecting the dots.

2. Most on this site are basically transsexual porn addicts, so my assumptions are rather accurate, and what is incredibly hilarious is many are disturbed that they might be gay or something else due to their odd fascination with dicks on chicks.

I LOL'd at most threads scanned, most posts and inquiries are rudimentary in nature with little thought behind it.

[smc]

1. Psychoanalysis is the wrong term, more like astute observation and connecting the dots.

2. Most on this site are basically transsexual porn addicts, so my assumptions are rather accurate, and what is incredibly hilarious is many are disturbed that they might be gay or something else due to their odd fascination with dicks on chicks.

I LOL'd at most threads scanned, most posts and inquiries are rudimentary in nature with little thought behind it.

Wow, you have moved firmly into first place in the "I'm-the-most-full-of-myself-on-this-site" sweepstakes. Not to mention the "I'm-obviously-the-most-intelligent-and-thoughtful" sweepstakes, too.

We have a lot of thoughtful posts and discussions here, but clearly we don't rise to the level of someone as great as you. I suggest you find somewhere else to participate.

[justforKicks]

1. Psychoanalysis is the wrong term, more like astute observation and connecting the dots.

2. Most on this site are basically transsexual porn addicts, so my assumptions are rather accurate, and what is incredibly hilarious is many are disturbed that they might be gay or something else due to their odd fascination with dicks on chicks.

I LOL'd at most threads scanned, most posts and inquiries are rudimentary in nature with little thought behind it.

(sorry if any of my comments seemed objective smc iam kinda new here) but you should leave this forum "interesting" on the account of being a total "douchebag". parden my french :hug: